ChanRobles Virtual law Library
PHILIPPINE LAWS, STATUTES & CODES
A collection of Philippine laws, statutes and codes not included or cited in the main indices of the Chan Robles Virtual Law Library.
:
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS
PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ PHILIPPINE LAWS, STATUTES & CODES
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 50 -
SUSPENDING ATTY. ANTONIO S. ROQUE FROM OFFICE AS REGIONAL DIRECTOR FOR
REGION 8 OF THE CITIZENS LEGAL ASSISTANCE OFFICE
This refers to the administrative case
filed by Florentina L. Laurente, Winifredo Losmagos and Gloria Losmagos
against Atty. Antonio S. Roque, Regional Director for Region 8 of the
Citizens Legal Assistance Office, for gross negligence and for
demanding and receiving from complainants the amount of
P500.00.
As regards the first charge, records show that, on December 6, 1979,
respondent filed with the then Court of First Instance of Leyte Civil
Case No. 5973 (for partition and accounting with damages) with the
complainants herein and six others as plaintiffs. On March 31, 1982,
the Regional Trial Court of Leyte dismissed the aforesaid case for
failure of the plaintiffs to prosecute the case, citing as lack of
interest the latter's inaction for almost two (2) years. On motion of
the plaintiffs, the Court, in its Order of April 28, 1982, reinstated
the case and set it for hearing on May 24, 1982. Thereafter, the Court
again dismissed the case. In dismissing the case for the second time,
the Court noted that plaintiffs did not move to declare defendants in
default despite their (defendants) failure to file a responsive
pleading within the reglementary period; and observed that plaintiffs
did not even try to find out if the defendants had been served with
summons. All these were viewed by the Court as patent and obvious lack
of interest on the part of the plaintiffs to prosecute the case. Two
motions for reconsideration were filed by respondent, which were,
however, denied by the Court in an Order dated July 5, 1982.
In his defense, respondent averred that the civil case was not at all
triable, as some defendants had not been summoned, the responsibility
for which lies not in him but with the Court; that the Court had not
appointed a guardian ad-litem for the three defendants who were minors;
and that, since the civil case was for partition of property, a
declaration of default would serve no purpose, since a defaulted party
will not be excluded from the partition.
The defense interposed by respondent is devoid of merit. Respondent's
bare allegation shifting the burden of responsibility to the Court
cannot prevail over the positive findings of the latter of plaintiffs'
failure to prosecute. There is nothing in the records that would show
that, after respondent had filed the case, he tried to determine if the
case was ready for trial. Neither did he exert any effort to ensure the
early trial of the case.
With regard to the other charge of demanding and receiving P500.00 from
complainants without issuing a proper receipt therefore, no sufficient
evidence was presented finding respondent guilty thereof.
WHEREFORE, and as recommended by the Secretary of Justice, Atty.
Antonio S. Roque is found guilty of negligence in handling Civil Case
No. 5973 and is hereby suspended from office as Regional Director for
Region 8 of the Citizens Legal Assistance Office for a period of one
(1) month without pay, effective upon receipt of a copy of this Order.
He is also warned that repetition of the same or similar offense will
be dealt with more severely.
Done in the City of Manila,
this 26th day of November, in the year of Our Lord, nineteen hundred
and eighty-seven.
chanrobles virtual law library
Back
to Main
Since 19.07.98.