|

FIRST
DIVISION
THE
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
G.
R.
No. 48058
October
20, 1944
-versus-
CLEMENCIO
ABAQUITA,
Defendant-Appellee.
D
E C I S I
O N
OZAETA,
J :
This
case of Homicide thru
Reckless Imprudence commenced in the Court of First Instance of Cebu on
October 2, 1940, is before Us for the second time. The first time, it
was
brought here on appeal by the Government from an Order of the trial
Court
remanding the case to the Municipal Court of Cebu for preliminary
investigation.
In Our Decision of September 4, 1942, We reversed that order and
instructed
the trial Court to proceed. But the trial Court [then presided over by
another judge], instead of proceeding, dismissed the case on motion of
the accused upon the ground of supposed lack of jurisdiction arising
from
the change of sovereignty. Hence, this second appeal by the Government.
We are constrained
again to reverse the trial Court. The supposed lack of jurisdiction is
premised on the trivial and over-technical observation that the heading
of the Information describes or indicates the former and not the
present
sovereignty under which the case is prosecuted. We do not think such a
purely formal defect in the heading of the Information [if defect it
has
become] affected the jurisdiction of the Court. If it did, practically
all the final judgments rendered by our Courts of Justice during the
last
thirty-two months in cases filed before 1942 would have to be declared
null and void. The mere suggestion of such a stupendous and devastating
consequence should make one pause and reflect: Is the court's
jurisdiction
conferred by, or in any way dependent upon, the heading of the
Information
or Complaint? We are not aware of any law to that effect. It is the
parties
and the subject matter that should be considered. If the heading or
superscription
to the pleading is of any consequence, it may, with the aid of common
sense
and a little imagination, be taken for granted as having been impliedly
and necessarily changed with the changing circumstances, as indeed the
trial court must have so taken it for granted when, without any change
in the heading of the original information, it used in the very order
appealed
from the heading it considered appropriate under the then existing
circumstances,
namely, "Philippine Executive Commission," in lieu of "Commonwealth of
the Philippines."
The Order appealed
from is reversed and the case is again ordered remanded to the Court of
origin for trial and Decision on the merits, with costs against the
appellee.
Yulo, C.J.,
Moran, Horrilleno and Paras, JJ., concur.
YULO, C.J.:chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
Mr. Justice Bocobo
took no part in the deliberation and voted to reverse and remand. |