Read more

Opinions

• Per Curiam

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

_________________

No. 14–1516

_________________

STEPHEN DUNCAN, WARDEN, PETITIONER v. LAWRENCE OWENS

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit

[January 20, 2016]

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Law library cases is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Law library case is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Law library makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Law library or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

First Party

Stephen Duncan

Second Party

Lawrence Owens

Official Citation

577 U.S. __ (2016)

Docket No.

14-1516

Granted

September 30, 2015

Argued

January 11, 2016

Decided

January 19, 2016