24 C.F.R. § 901.40   Indicator #7, resident services and community building.


Title 24 - Housing and Urban Development


Title 24: Housing and Urban Development
PART 901—PUBLIC HOUSING MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

Browse Previous |  Browse Next

§ 901.40   Indicator #7, resident services and community building.

This indicator examines the PHA's efforts to deliver quality customer services and to encourage partnerships with residents, resident organizations, and the local community, including non-PHA service providers, that help improve management operations at the PHA; and to encourage programs that promote individual responsibility, self improvement and community involvement among residents and assist them to achieve economic uplift and develop self-sufficiency. Also, if applicable, this indicator examines PHA performance under any special HUD grant(s) administered by the PHA. PHAs can get credit for performance under non-HUD funded programs if they choose to be assessed for these programs. PHAs with fewer than 250 units or with 100% elderly developments will not be assessed under this indicator unless they request to be assessed at the time of PHMAP certification submission. This indicator has a weight of x1.

(a) Component #1, economic uplift and self-improvement. PHAs will be assessed for all the programs that the PHA has HUD funding to implement. Also, PHAs can get credit for implementation of programs through partnerships with non-PHA providers, even if the programs are not funded by HUD or the PHA, if they choose to be assessed for them. PHAs must select either to be assessed for all or none of the non-HUD funded programs. This component has a weight of x1.

(1) Grade A: The PHA Board of Commissioners, by resolution, has adopted one or more economic uplift and self-improvement programs, examples include but are not limited to, the Section 3 program, homeownership, PHA support for resident education, training, child-care, job-placement programs, Head Start, etc., and the PHA can document that it has implemented these programs in developments covering at least 90% of its family occupied units, either directly or through partnerships with non-PHA providers, and the PHA monitors performance under the programs and issues reports concerning progress, including residents receiving services and residents employed, under these programs.

(2) Grade C: The PHA Board of Commissioners, by resolution, has adopted one or more economic uplift and self-improvement programs, including but not limited to, the programs described in grade A, above, and the PHA can document that it has implemented these programs in developments covering at least 60% of its family occupied units, either directly or through partnerships with non-PHA providers, and the PHA staff monitors performance under the programs and issues reports to the Board concerning progress, including residents receiving services and residents employed, under these programs.

(3) Grade F: The PHA Board of Commissioners, by resolution, has not adopted one or more economic uplift and self-improvement programs, including but not limited to, the programs described in grade A, above, or the PHA has not implemented these programs in developments covering at least 60% of its family occupied units, either directly or through partnerships with non-PHA providers.

(b) Component #2, resident organization. This component has a weight of x1.

(1) Grade A: The PHA can document formal recognition of, a system of communication and collaboration with, and support for resident councils where these exist, and where no resident council exists, the PHA can document its encouragement for the formation of such councils.

(2) Grade F: The PHA cannot document formal recognition of, or a system of communication and collaboration with, or document its support for resident councils where these exist, or where no resident council exists, the PHA cannot document its encouragement for the formation of such councils.

(c) Component #3, resident involvement. Implicit in this component is the need to ensure a PHA's delivery of quality customer services to residents. This component has a weight of x1.

(1) Grade A: The PHA Board of Commissioners, by resolution, provides for resident representation on the Board and committees, and the PHA has implemented measures that ensure the opportunity for regular resident input into plans and the evaluation for ongoing quality of life and housing management conditions, including but not limited to, modernization and development programs, screening and other occupancy matters, relocation, the operating budget, resident programs, security and maintenance programs.

(2) Grade C: The PHA Board of Commissioners, by resolution, provides for resident representation on the Board and committees, and the PHA has implemented measures that ensure the opportunity for regular resident input into plans and the evaluation for ongoing quality of life and housing management conditions in the modernization and development programs and at least three of the remaining six areas described in grade A, above.

(3) Grade F: The PHA Board of Commissioners, by resolution, did not provide for resident representation on the Board and committees, or the PHA has not implemented measures that ensure the opportunity for regular resident input into plans and the evaluation for ongoing quality of life and housing management conditions in the modernization and development programs and at least three of the remaining six areas described in grade A, above.

(d) Component #4, resident programs management. This component examines a PHA's management of HUD funded resident programs. However, PHAs can also get credit for performance under non-HUD funded programs if they choose to be assessed for them. PHAs must select either to be assessed for all or none of the non-HUD funded programs. This component has a weight of x1.

(1) Grade A: If the PHA has any HUD funded special programs that benefit the residents, including but not limited to, the Family Investment Center (FIC), Youth Sports (YS), Food Banks, Health Clinics, Youth Apprenticeship Program (YAP), Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS), or a Resident Management (RM) or Tenant Opportunity Programs (TOP) where the PHA is the contract administrator, the PHA can document that it is meeting at least 90% of its goals under the implementation plan for any and all of these programs.

(2) Grade C: If the PHA has any HUD-funded special programs that benefit the residents, including but not limited to, the programs described in grade A, above, the PHA can document that it is meeting at least 60% of its goals under the implementation plan for any and all of these programs.

(3) Grade F: If the PHA has any HUD-funded special programs that benefit the residents, including but not limited to, the programs described in grade A, above, the PHA cannot document that it is meeting at least 60% of its goals under the implementation plan for all of these programs.

Browse Previous |  Browse Next






















chanrobles.com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com