24 C.F.R. Subpart F—Transition Policy and Transition Funding


Title 24 - Housing and Urban Development


Title 24: Housing and Urban Development
PART 990—THE PUBLIC HOUSING OPERATING FUND PROGRAM

Browse Previous |  Browse Next

Subpart F—Transition Policy and Transition Funding

§ 990.220   Purpose.

This policy is aimed at assisting all PHAs in transitioning to the new funding levels as determined by the formula set forth in this rule. PHAs will be subject to a transition funding policy that will either increase or reduce their total operating subsidy for a given year.

§ 990.225   Transition determination.

The determination of the amount and period of the transition funding shall be based on the difference in subsidy levels between the formula set forth in this part and the formula in effect prior to implementation of the formula set forth in this part. The difference in subsidy levels will be calculated using FY 2004 data. When actual data are not available for one of the formula components needed to calculate the formula of this part for FY 2004, HUD will use alternate data as a substitute (e.g., unit months available for eligible unit months, etc.) If the difference between these formulas indicates that a PHA shall have its operating subsidy reduced as a result of this formula, the PHA will be subject to a transition policy as indicated in §990.230. If the difference between these formulas indicates that a PHA will have its operating subsidy increased as a result of this formula, the PHA will be subject to the transition policy as indicated in §990.235.

[70 FR 54997, Sept. 19, 2005; 70 FR 61367, Oct. 24, 2005]

§ 990.230   PHAs that will experience a subsidy reduction.

(a) For PHAs that will experience a reduction in their operating subsidy, as determined in §990.225, such reductions will have a limit of:

(1) 24 percent of the difference between the two funding levels in the first year following implementation of the formula contained in this part;

(2) 43 percent of the difference between the two funding levels in the second year following implementation of the formula contained in this part;

(3) 62 percent of the difference between the two levels in the third year following implementation of the formula contained in this part; and

(4) 81 percent of the difference between the two levels in the fourth year following implementation of the formula contained in this part.

(b) The full amount of the reduction in the operating subsidy level shall be realized in the fifth year following implementation of the formula contained in this part.

(c) For example, a PHA has a subsidy reduction from $1 million under the formula in effect prior to implementation of the formula contained in this part to $900,000 under the formula contained in this part using FY 2004 data. The difference would be calculated at $100,000 ($1 million−$900,000 = $100,000). In the first year, the subsidy reduction would be limited to $24,000 (24 percent of the difference). Thus, the PHA will receive an operating subsidy amount of this rule plus a transition-funding amount of $76,000 (the $100,000 difference between the two subsidy amounts minus the $24,000 reduction limit).

(d) If a PHA can demonstrate a successful conversion to the asset management requirements of subpart H of this part, as determined under paragraph (f) of this section, HUD will discontinue the reduction at the PHA's next subsidy calculation following such demonstration, as reflected in the schedule in paragraph (e) of this section, notwithstanding §990.290(c).

(e) The schedule of reductions for a PHA that will experience a reduction in subsidy is reflected in the table below.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                  Demonstration dated         Funding period                    by                             Reduction limited to----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Prior to year 1.................  October 1, 2006....  5 percent of the difference between                                                       the two funding levels.Year 1..........................  October 1, 2007....  24 percent of the difference.Year 2..........................  October 1, 2008....  43 percent of the difference.Year 3..........................  October 1, 2009....  62 percent of the difference.Year 4..........................  October 1, 2010....  81 percent of the difference.Year 5..........................  October 1, 2011....  Full reduction reached.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(f)(1) For purposes of this section, compliance with the asset management requirements of subpart H of this part will be based on an independent assessment conducted by a HUD-approved professional familiar with property management practices in the region or state in which the PHA is located.

(2) A PHA must select from a list of HUD-approved professionals to conduct the independent assessment. The professional review and recommendation will then be forwarded to the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing (or designee) for final determination of compliance with the asset management requirements of subpart H of this part.

(3) Upon completion of the independent assessment, the assessor shall conduct an exit conference with the PHA. In response to the exit conference, the PHA may submit a management response and other pertinent information (including, but not limited to, an additional assessment procured at the PHAs' own expense) within ten working days of the exit conference to be included in the report submitted to HUD.

(4) In the event that HUD is unable to produce a list of independent assessors on a timely basis, the PHA may submit its own demonstration of a successful conversion to asset management directly to HUD for determination of compliance.

(5) The Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing (or designee) shall consider all information submitted and respond with a final determination of compliance within 60 days of the independent assessor's report being submitted to HUD.

[70 FR 54997, Sept. 19, 2005; 70 FR 61367, Oct. 24, 2005]

§ 990.235   PHAs that will experience a subsidy increase.

(a) For PHAs that will experience a gain in their operating subsidy, as determined in §990.225, such increases will have a limit of 50 percent of the difference between the two funding levels in the first year following implementation of the formula contained in this part.

(b) The full amount of the increase in the operating subsidy level shall be realized in the second year following implementation of the formula contained in this part.

(c) For example, a PHA's subsidy increased from $900,000 under the formula in effect prior to implementation of the formula contained in this part to $1 million under the formula contained in this part using FY 2004 data. The difference would be calculated at $100,000 ($1 million−$900,000 = $100,000). In the first year, the subsidy increase would be limited to $50,000 (50 percent of the difference). Thus, in this example the PHA will receive the operating subsidy amount of this rule minus a transition-funding amount of $50,000 (the $100,000 difference between the two subsidy amounts minus the $50,000 transition amount).

(d) The schedule for a PHA whose subsidy would be increased is reflected in the table below.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------        Funding  period                    Increase limited to------------------------------------------------------------------------Year 1........................  50 percent of the difference.Year 2........................  Full increase reached.------------------------------------------------------------------------

[70 FR 54997, Sept. 19, 2005; 70 FR 61367, Oct. 24, 2005]

Browse Previous |  Browse Next






















chanrobles.com