24 C.F.R. Subpart F—Recipient Monitoring, Oversight and Accountability
Title 24 - Housing and Urban Development
The recipient, the grant beneficiary and HUD are involved in monitoring activities under NAHASDA. (a) The recipient is responsible for monitoring grant activities, ensuring compliance with applicable Federal requirements and monitoring performance goals under the IHP. The recipient is responsible for preparing at least annually: a compliance assessment in accordance with section 403(b) of NAHASDA; a performance report covering the assessment of program progress and goal attainment under the IHP; and an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act, as applicable. The recipient's monitoring should also include an evaluation of the recipient's performance in accordance with performance objectives and measures. At the request of a recipient, other Indian tribes and/or TDHEs may provide assistance to aid the recipient in meeting its performance goals or compliance requirements under NAHASDA. (b) Where the recipient is a TDHE, the grant beneficiary (Indian tribe) is responsible for monitoring programmatic and compliance requirements of the IHP and NAHASDA by requiring the TDHE to prepare periodic progress reports including the annual compliance assessment, performance and audit reports. (c) HUD is responsible for reviewing the recipient as set forth in §1000.520. (d) HUD monitoring will consist of on-site as well as off-site review of records, reports and audits. To the extent funding is available, HUD or its designee will provide technical assistance and training, or funds to the recipient to obtain technical assistance and training. In the absence of funds, HUD shall make best efforts to provide technical assistance and training. Performance objectives are developed by each recipient. Performance objectives are criteria by which the recipient will monitor and evaluate its performance. For example, if in the IHP the recipient indicates it will build new houses, the performance objective may be the completion of the homes within a certain time period and within a certain budgeted amount. Yes. The Indian tribe as the grant beneficiary must receive a copy of the monitoring evaluation/results so that it can fully carry out its oversight responsibilities under NAHASDA. If the recipient's monitoring activities identify areas of concerns, the recipient will take corrective actions which may include but are not limited to one or more of the following actions: (a) Depending upon the nature of the concern, the recipient may obtain additional training or technical assistance from HUD, other Indian tribes or TDHEs, or other entities. (b) The recipient may develop and/or revise policies, or ensure that existing policies are better enforced. (c) The recipient may take appropriate administrative action to remedy the situation. (d) The recipient may refer the concern to an auditor or to HUD for additional corrective action. The Indian tribe shall have the responsibility to ensure that appropriate corrective action is taken. Yes. An annual report shall be submitted by the recipient to HUD and the Indian tribe being served in a format acceptable by HUD. Annual performance reports shall contain: (a) The information required by sections 403(b) and 404(b) of NAHASDA; (b) Brief information on the following: (1) A comparison of actual accomplishments to the objectives established for the period; (2) The reasons for slippage if established objectives were not met; and (3) Analysis and explanation of cost overruns or high unit costs; and (c) Any information regarding the recipient's performance in accordance with HUD's performance measures, as set forth in section §1000.524. The annual performance report must be submitted within 60 days of the end of the recipient's program year. If a justified request is submitted by the recipient, the Area ONAP may extend the due date for submission of the performance report. For the first annual performance report to be submitted under NAHASDA, the period to be covered is October 1, 1997, through September 30, 1998. This first report must be submitted by January 31, 1999. Subsequent annual performance reports must cover the period that coincides with the recipient's program year. [64 FR 3015, Jan. 20, 1999] The recipient must make its report publicly available to tribal members, non-Indians served under NAHASDA, and other citizens in the Indian area, in sufficient time to permit comment before submission of the report to HUD. The recipient determines the manner and times for making the report available. The recipient shall include a summary of any comments received by the grant beneficiary or recipient from tribal members, non-Indians served under NAHASDA, and other citizens in the Indian area. At least annually, HUD will review each recipient's performance to determine whether the recipient: (a) Has carried out its eligible activities in a timely manner, has carried out its eligible activities and certifications in accordance with the requirements and the primary objective of NAHASDA and with other applicable laws and has a continuing capacity to carry out those activities in a timely manner; (b) Has complied with the IHP of the grant beneficiary; and (c) Whether the performance reports of the recipient are accurate. 60 days. HUD shall generally provide a 30 day written notice of an impending on-site review to the Indian tribe and TDHE. Prior written notice will not be required in emergency situations. All notices shall state the general nature of the review. HUD has the authority to develop performance measures which the recipient must meet as a condition for compliance under NAHASDA. The performance measures are: (a) Within 2 years of grant award under NAHASDA, no less than 90 percent of the grant must be obligated. (b) The recipient has complied with the required certifications in its IHP and all policies and the IHP have been made available to the public. (c) Fiscal audits have been conducted on a timely basis and in accordance with the requirements of the Single Audit Act, as applicable. Any deficiencies identified in audit reports have been addressed within the prescribed time period. (d) Accurate annual performance reports were submitted to HUD within 60 days after the completion of the recipient's program year. (e) The recipient has met the IHP goals and objectives in the 1-year plan and demonstrated progress on the 5-year plan goals and objectives. (f) The recipient has substantially complied with the requirements of 24 CFR part 1000 and all other applicable Federal statutes and regulations. In reviewing each recipient's performance, HUD may consider the following: (a) The approved IHP and any amendments thereto; (b) Reports prepared by the recipient; (c) Records maintained by the recipient; (d) Results of HUD's monitoring of the recipient's performance, including on-site evaluation of the quality of the work performed; (e) Audit reports; (f) Records of drawdown(s) of grant funds; (g) Records of comments and complaints by citizens and organizations within the Indian area; (h) Litigation; and (i) Any other reliable relevant information which relates to the performance measures under §1000.524. HUD will issue a draft report to the recipient and Indian tribe within thirty (30) days of the completion of HUD's review. The recipient will have at least thirty (30) days to review and comment on the draft report as well as provide any additional information relating to the draft report. HUD shall consider the comments and any additional information provided by the recipient. HUD may also revise the draft report based on the comments and any additional information provided by the recipient. HUD shall make the recipient's comments and a final report readily available to the recipient, grant beneficiary, and the public not later than thirty (30) days after receipt of the recipient's comments and additional information. (a) The following actions are designed, first, to prevent the continuance of the performance problem(s); second, to mitigate any adverse effects or consequences of the performance problem(s); and third, to prevent a recurrence of the same or similar performance problem. The following actions, at least one of which must be taken prior to a sanction under paragraph (b), may be taken by HUD singly or in combination, as appropriate for the circumstances: (1) Issue a letter of warning advising the recipient of the performance problem(s), describing the corrective actions that HUD believes should be taken, establishing a completion date for corrective actions, and notifying the recipient that more serious actions may be taken if the performance problem(s) is not corrected or is repeated; (2) Request the recipient to submit progress schedules for completing activities or complying with the requirements of this part; (3) Recommend that the recipient suspend, discontinue, or not incur costs for the affected activity; (4) Recommend that the recipient redirect funds from affected activities to other eligible activities; (5) Recommend that the recipient reimburse the recipient's program account in the amount improperly expended; and (6) Recommend that the recipient obtain appropriate technical assistance using existing grant funds or other available resources to overcome the performance problem(s). (b) Failure of a recipient to address performance problems specified in paragraph (a) above may result in the imposition of sanctions as prescribed in §1000.532 (providing for adjustment, reduction, or withdrawal of future grant funds, or other appropriate actions), or §1000.538 (providing for termination, reduction, or limited availability of payments, or replacement of the TDHE). (a) HUD may, subject to the procedures in paragraph (b) below, make appropriate adjustments in the amount of the annual grants under NAHASDA in accordance with the findings of HUD pursuant to reviews and audits under section 405 of NAHASDA. HUD may adjust, reduce, or withdraw grant amounts, or take other action as appropriate in accordance with the reviews and audits, except that grant amounts already expended on affordable housing activities may not be recaptured or deducted from future assistance provided on behalf of an Indian tribe. (b) Before undertaking any action in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section, HUD will notify the recipient in writing of the actions it intends to take and provide the recipient an opportunity for an informal meeting to resolve the deficiency. In the event the deficiency is not resolved, HUD may take any of the actions available under paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section. However, the recipient may request, within 30 days of notice of the action, a hearing in accordance with §1000.540. The amount in question shall not be reallocated under the provisions of §1000.536, until 15 days after the hearing has been held and HUD has rendered a final decision. (c) Absent circumstances beyond the recipient's control, when a recipient is not complying significantly with a major activity of its IHP, HUD shall make appropriate adjustment, reduction, or withdrawal of some or all of the recipient's subsequent year grant in accordance with this section. HUD will review the circumstances of each noncompliance with NAHASDA and the regulations on a case-by-case basis to determine if the noncompliance is substantial. This review is a two step process. First, there must be a noncompliance with NAHASDA or these regulations. Second, the noncompliance must be substantial. A noncompliance is substantial if: (a) The noncompliance has a material effect on the recipient meeting its major goals and objectives as described in its Indian Housing Plan; (b) The noncompliance represents a material pattern or practice of activities constituting willful noncompliance with a particular provision of NAHASDA or the regulations, even if a single instance of noncompliance would not be substantial; (c) The noncompliance involves the obligation or expenditure of a material amount of the NAHASDA funds budgeted by the recipient for a material activity; or (d) The noncompliance places the housing program at substantial risk of fraud, waste or abuse. Such NAHASDA grant funds shall be distributed by HUD in accordance with the next NAHASDA formula allocation. (a) If HUD finds after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing that a recipient has failed to comply substantially with any provisions of NAHASDA, HUD shall: (1) Terminate payments under NAHASDA to the recipient; (2) Reduce payments under NAHASDA to the recipient by an amount equal to the amount of such payments that were not expended in accordance with NAHASDA; (3) Limit the availability of payments under NAHASDA to programs, projects, or activities not affected by the failure to comply; or (4) In the case of noncompliance described in §1000.542, provide a replacement TDHE for the recipient. (b) HUD may, upon due notice, suspend payments at any time after the issuance of the opportunity for hearing pending such hearing and final decision, to the extent HUD determines such action necessary to preclude the further expenditure of funds for activities affected by such failure to comply. (c) If HUD determines that the failure to comply substantially with the provisions of NAHASDA is not a pattern or practice of activities constituting willful noncompliance, and is a result of the limited capability or capacity of the recipient, HUD may provide technical assistance for the recipient (directly or indirectly) that is designed to increase the capability or capacity of the recipient to administer assistance under NAHASDA in compliance with the requirements under NAHASDA. (d) In lieu of, or in addition to, any action described in this section, if HUD has reason to believe that the recipient has failed to comply substantially with any provisions of NAHASDA, HUD may refer the matter to the Attorney General of the United States, with a recommendation that appropriate civil action be instituted. The hearing procedures in 24 CFR part 26 shall be used. (a) In accordance with section 402 of NAHASDA, as a condition of HUD making a grant on behalf of an Indian tribe, the Indian tribe shall agree that, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, HUD may, only in the circumstances discussed below, require that a replacement TDHE serve as the recipient for the Indian tribe. (b) HUD may require a replacement TDHE for an Indian tribe only upon a determination by HUD on the record after opportunity for hearing that the recipient for the Indian tribe has engaged in a pattern or practice of activities that constitute substantial or willful noncompliance with the requirements of NAHASDA. The recipient must comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A–133 which require annual audits of recipients that expend Federal funds equal to or in excess of an amount specified by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, which is currently set at $300,000. Yes, audit costs are an eligible program or administrative expense. If the Indian tribe is the recipient then program funds can be used to pay a prorated share of the tribal audit or financial review cost that is attributable to NAHASDA funded activities. For a recipient not covered by the Single Audit Act, but which chooses to obtain a periodic financial review, the cost of such a review would be an eligible program expense. Yes. A copy of the latest recipient audit under the Single Audit Act relating to NAHASDA activities must be submitted with the Annual Performance Report. Yes. The Indian tribe as the grant beneficiary must receive a copy of the audit report so that it can fully carry out its oversight responsibilities with NAHASDA. (a) This section applies to all financial and programmatic records, supporting documents, and statistical records of the recipient which are required to be maintained by the statute, regulation, or grant agreement. (b) Except as otherwise provided herein, records must be retained for three years from the date the recipient submits to HUD the annual performance report that covers the last expenditure of grant funds under a particular grant. (c) If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving the records has been started before the expiration of the 3-year period, the records must be retained until completion of the action and resolution of all issues which arise from it, or until the end of the regular 3-year period, whichever is later. (a) HUD and the Comptroller General of the United States, and any of their authorized representatives, shall have the right of access to any pertinent books, documents, papers, or other records of recipients which are pertinent to NAHASDA assistance, in order to make audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcripts. (b) The right of access in this section lasts as long as the records are maintained. FOIA does not apply to recipient records. However, there may be other applicable State and tribal access laws or recipient policies which may apply. The Federal Privacy Act does not apply to recipient records. However, there may be other applicable State and tribal access laws or recipient policies which may apply. This appendix shows the different components of the IHBG formula. The following text explains how each component of the IHBG formula works. 1. The Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) formula is calculated by initially determining the amount a tribe receives for Formula Current Assisted Stock (FCAS) (See §§1000.310 and 1000.312. FCAS funding is comprised of two components, operating subsidy (§1000.316(a)) and modernization (§1000.316(b)). The operating subsidy component is calculated based on the national per unit subsidy provided in FY 1996 (adjusted to a 100 percent funding level) for each of the following types of programs—Low Rent, Homeownership (Mutual Help and Turnkey III), and Section 8. A tribe's total units in each of the above categories is multiplied times the relevant national per unit subsidy amount. That amount is summed and multiplied times a local area cost adjustment factor for management. 2. The local area cost adjustment factor for management is called AELFMR. AELFMR is the greater of a tribe's Allowable Expense Level (AEL) or Fair Market Rent (FMR) factor, where the AEL and FMR factors are determined by dividing each tribe's AEL and FMR by their respective national weighted average (weighted on the unadjusted allocation under FCAS operating subsidy). The adjustment made to the FCAS component of the IHBG formula is then the new AELFMR factor divided by the national weighted average of the AELFMR (See §1000.320). 3. The modernization component of FCAS is based on the national per unit modernization funding provided in FY 1996 to Indian Housing Authorities (IHAs). The per unit amount is determined by dividing the modernization funds by the total Low Rent, Mutual Help, and Turnkey III units operated by IHAs in 1996. A tribe's total Low Rent, Mutual Help, and Turnkey III units are multiplied times the per unit modernization amount. That amount is then multiplied times a local area cost adjustment factor for construction (e.g. the Total Development Cost) (See §1000.320). 4. The construction adjustment factor is Total Development Cost (TDC) for the area divided by the weighted national average for TDC (weighted on the unadjusted allocation for modernization) (See §1000.320). 5. After determining the total amount allocated under FCAS for each tribe, it is summed for every tribe. The national total amount for FCAS is subtracted from the Fiscal Year appropriation to determine the total amount to be allocated under the Need component of the IHBG formula. 6. The Need component of the IHBG formula is calculated using seven factors weighted as set forth in §1000.324 as follows: 22 percent of the allocated funds will be allocated by a tribe's share of the total Native American households paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing living in the Indian tribe's formula area, 25 percent of the funds allocated under Need will be allocated by a tribe's share of the total Native American households overcrowded and or without kitchen or plumbing living in their formula area, and so on. The current national totals for each of the need variables will be distributed annually by HUD with the Formula Response Form (See §1000.332). The national totals will change as tribes update information about their formula area and data for individual areas are challenged (See §§1000.334 and 1000.336). The Need component is then calculated by multiplying a tribe's share of housing need by a local area cost adjustment factor for construction (the Total Development Cost) (See §1000.338). 7. No tribe in its first year of funding will receive less than $50,000 under the Need component of the formula. In subsequent allocations to a tribe, it will receive no less than $25,000 under the Need component of the formula. This increase in funding for the tribes receiving the minimum Need allocation is funded by a reallocation from all tribes receiving more than $50,000 under their Need component. This is necessary in order to keep the total allocation within the appropriation level. Such minimum Need allocations will only continue through FY 2002 (See §1000.328). 8. A tribe's total grant is calculated by summing the FCAS and Need allocations. This preliminary grant is compared to how much a tribe received in FY 1996 for operating subsidy and modernization. If a tribe received more in FY 1996 for operating subsidy and modernization than they do under the IHBG formula, their grant is adjusted up to the FY 1996 level (See §1000.340). Indian tribes receiving more under the IHBG formula than in FY 1996 “pay” for the upward adjustment for the other tribes by having their grants adjusted downward. Because many more Indian tribes have grant amounts above the FY 1996 level than those with grants below the FY 1996 level, each tribe contributes very little relative to their total grant to fund the adjustment. [63 FR 12373, Mar. 12, 1998; 63 FR 13105, Mar. 17, 1998] 1. The Indian Housing Block Grant Formula consists of two components, the Formula Current Assisted Stock (FCAS) and Need. Therefore, the formula allocation before adjusting for the statutory requirement that a tribe's minimum grant will not be less than the tribe's FY 1996 Operating Subsidy and Modernization funding, can be represented by: unadjGRANT = FCAS + NEED. 2. NAHASDA requires the current assisted stock be provided for before allocating funds based on need. Therefore, FCAS must be calculated first. FCAS consists to two components, Operating Subsidy (OPSUB) and Modernization (MOD) such that: FCAS = OPSUB + MOD. 3. OPSUB consists of three main parts: Number of Low-Rent units; Number of Section 8 units; and Number of Mutual Help and Turnkey III units. Each of these main parts are adjusted by the FY 1996 national per unit subsidy, an inflation factor, and local area costs as reflected by the greater of the AEL factor or FMR factor. The AEL factor as defined in §1000.302 as the difference between a local area Allowable Expense Level (AEL) and the national weighted average for AEL. The FMR factor is also defined in §1000.302 as the difference between a local area Fair Market Rent (FMR) and the national weighted average for FMR. So, expanding OPSUB gives: OPSUB = [LR * LRSUB + (MH+TK) * HOSUB + S8 * S8SUB] * INF * AELFMR Where: LR = number of Low-Rent units. LRSUB = FY 1996 national per unit average subsidy for Low-Rent units = $2,440. MH+TK = number of Mutual Help and Turnkey III units. HOSUB = FY 1996 national per unit average subsidy for Homeownership units = $528. S8 = number of Section 8 units. S8SUB = FY 1996 national per unit average subsidy for Section 8 units = $3,625. INF = inflation adjustment determined by the Consumer Price Index for housing. AELFMR = greater of AEL Factor or FMR Factor weighted by national average of AEL Factor and FRM Factor. AEL FACTOR = AEL/NAAEL. AEL = local Allowable Expense Level. NAAEL = national weighted average for AEL. FMR FACTOR = FMR/NAFMR. FMR = local Fair Market Rent. NAFMR = national weighted average for FMR. NAAELFMR = national weighted average for greater of AEL Factor or FMR factor. For estimating FY 1998 allocations: NAAEL = 240.224. NAFMR = 459.437. NAAELFMR = 1.144. 4. MOD considers only the number of Low-Rent, and Mutual Help and Turnkey III units. Each of these are adjusted by the FY 1996 national per unit subsidy for modernization, an inflation factor and the local Total Development Costs relative to the weighted national average for TDC. So, expanding MOD gives us: MOD = [LR + (MH+TK)] * SUB * INF * TDC/NATDC. Where: LR = number of Low-Rent units. MH+TK = number of Mutual Help and Turnkey III units. SUB = FY 1996 national per unit average subsidy for modernization. INF = inflation adjustment determined by the Consumer Price Index for housing. TDC = Local Total Development Costs defined in §1000.302. NATDC = weighted national average for TDC. For estimating FY 1998 allocations: SUB = $1,974. NATDC = $103,828. 5. Now that calculation for FCAS is complete, we can determine how many funds will be available to allocate over the NEED component of the formula by calculating: NEED FUNDS = APPROPRIATION—NATCAS. Where: APPROPRIATION = dollars provided by Congress for distribution by the IHBG formula. NATCAS = summation of CAS allocations for all tribes. For estimating FY 1998 allocations: APPROPRIATION = $590 million. NATCAS = $236,147,110. 6. Two iterations are necessary to compute the final Need allocation. The first iteration consists of seven weighted criteria that allocate need funds based on a tribe's population and housing data. This allocation is then adjusted for local area cost differences based on TDC relative to the national weighted average. This can be represented by: NEED1 = [(0.11 * PER / NPER) + (0.13 * HHLE30 / NHHLE30) + (0.07 * HH30T50 / NHH30T50) + (0.07 * HH50T80 / NHH50T80) + (0.25 * OCRPR / NOCRPR) + (0.22 * SCBTOT / NSCBTOT) + (0.15 * HOUSHOR / NHOUSHOR)] * NEED FUNDS * (TDC/NATDC). Where: PER = American Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) persons. NPER = national total of PER. HHLE30 = AIAN households less than 30% of median income. NHHLE30 = national total of HHLE30. HH30T50 = AIAN households 30% to 50% of median income. NHH30T50 = national total of HH30T50. HH50T80 = AIAN households 50% to 80% of median income. NHH50TO80 = national total of HH50T80. OCRPR = AIAN households crowded or without complete kitchen or plumbing. NOCRPR = national total of OCRPR. SCBTOT = AIAN households paying more than 50% of their income for housing. NSCBTOT = national total SCBTOT. HOUSHOR = AIAN households with an annual income less than or equal to 80% of formula median income reduced by the combination of current assisted stock and units developed under NAHASDA. NHOUSHOR = national total of HOUSHOR. TDC = Local Total Development Costs defined in §1000.302. NATDC = weighted national average for TDC. For estimating FY 1998 allocations: NPER = 953,254. NHHLE30 = 78,496. NHH30T50 = 52,514. NHH50T80 = 59,793. NOCPR = 80,581. NSCBTOT = 34,080. NHOUSHOR = 23,840. NEEDFUNDS = $353,852,890. NATDC = $104,956. 7. The second iteration in computing Need allocation consists of adjusting the Need allocation computed above to take into account the $50,000 baseline funding for the first year only and then $25,000 per year for each year thereafter through FY 2002. So, if in the first Need computation you have less than the minimum Needs funding level, your Need allocation will go up. But, if you have more than the minimum Needs funding level, your Need allocation will go down to adjust for the other Need allocations going up. We can represent this by: If NEED1 is less than MINFUNDING, then NEED = MINFUNDING. If NEED1 is greater than or equal to MINFUNDING, then NEED = NEED1−{mUNDERMIN$*[ (NEED1−MINFUNDING)/OVERMIN$]}. Where: MINFUNDING = minimum needs funding level. UNDERMIN$ = for all tribes with NEED1 less than MINFUNDING, sum of the differences between MINFUNDING and NEED1. OVERMIN$ = for all tribes with NEED1 greater than or equal to MINFUNDING, sum of the difference between NEED1 and MINFUNDING. For estimating FY 1998 allocations: MINFUNDING = $50,000. UNDERMIN$ = $4,919,224. OVERMIN$ = $335,022,114. 8. Now we have computed values for FCAS and NEED. This final step in computing the grant allocation is to adjust the sum of FCAS and NEED to reflect the statutory requirement that a tribe's minimum grant will not be less than that tribe's FY 1996 Operating Subsidy and Modernization funding. So, before adjusting for the minimum grant compute: unadjGRANT = FCAS + NEED where both FCAS and NEED are calculated above. 9. Now, apply test to determine if the GRANT (unadjusted for FY 1996) levels is greater than or equal to FY 1996 Operating Subsidy and Modernization funding. Let TEST = unadjGRANT—OPMOD96 . If TEST is less than 0, then GRANT = OPMOD96. If TEST is greater than or equal to 0, then GRANT = unadjGRANT—[UNDER1996 * (TEST / OVER1996)]. Where: OPMOD96 = funding received by tribe in FY 1996 for Operating Subsidy and Modernization UNDER1996 = for all tribes with TEST less than 0, sum of the absolute value of TEST. OVER1996 = for all tribes with TEST greater than or equal to 0, sum of TEST. For estimating FY 1998 allocations: UNDER1996 = $5,378,558. OVER1996 = $326,095,837. GRANT is the approximate grant amount in any given year for any given tribe. [63 FR 12373, Mar. 12, 1998; 63 FR 13105, Mar. 17, 1998]
Title 24: Housing and Urban Development
PART 1000—NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING ACTIVITIES
Subpart F—Recipient Monitoring, Oversight and Accountability
§ 1000.501 Who is involved in monitoring activities under NAHASDA?
§ 1000.502 What are the monitoring responsibilities of the recipient, the grant beneficiary and HUD under NAHASDA?
§ 1000.504 What are the recipient performance objectives?
§ 1000.506 If the TDHE is the recipient, must it submit its monitoring evaluation/results to the Indian tribe?
§ 1000.508 If the recipient monitoring identifies programmatic concerns, what happens?
§ 1000.510 What happens if tribal monitoring identifies compliance concerns?
§ 1000.512 Are performance reports required?
§ 1000.514 When must the annual performance report be submitted?
§ 1000.516 What reporting period is covered by the annual performance report?
§ 1000.518 When must a recipient obtain public comment on its annual performance report?
§ 1000.520 What are the purposes of HUD review?
§ 1000.521 After the receipt of the recipient's performance report, how long does HUD have to make recommendations under section 404(c) of NAHASDA?
§ 1000.522 How will HUD give notice of on-site reviews?
§ 1000.524 What are HUD's performance measures for the review?
§ 1000.526 What information will HUD use for its review?
§ 1000.528 What are the procedures for the recipient to comment on the result of HUD's review when HUD issues a report under section 405(b) of NAHASDA?
§ 1000.530 What corrective and remedial actions will HUD request or recommend to address performance problems prior to taking action under §1000.532 or §1000.538?
§ 1000.532 What are the adjustments HUD makes to a recipient's future year's grant amount under section 405 of NAHASDA?
§ 1000.534 What constitutes substantial noncompliance?
§ 1000.536 What happens to NAHASDA grant funds adjusted, reduced, withdrawn, or terminated under §1000.532 or §1000.538?
§ 1000.538 What remedies are available for substantial noncompliance?
§ 1000.540 What hearing procedures will be used under NAHASDA?
§ 1000.542 When may HUD require replacement of a recipient?
§ 1000.544 What audits are required?
§ 1000.546 Are audit costs eligible program or administrative expenses?
§ 1000.548 Must a copy of the recipient's audit pursuant to the Single Audit Act relating to NAHASDA activities be submitted to HUD?
§ 1000.550 If the TDHE is the recipient, does it have to submit a copy of its audit to the Indian tribe?
§ 1000.552 How long must the recipient maintain program records?
§ 1000.554 Which agencies have right of access to the recipient's records relating to activities carried out under NAHASDA?
§ 1000.556 Does the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) apply to recipient records?
§ 1000.558 Does the Federal Privacy Act apply to recipient records?
Appendix A to Part 1000—Indian Housing Block Grant Formula Mechanics
Appendix B to Part 1000—IHBG Block Grant Formula Mechanisms
