42 C.F.R. § 488.8 Federal review of accreditation organizations.
Title 42 - Public Health
(a) Review and approval of national accreditation organization. CMS's review and evaluation of a national accreditation organization will be conducted in accordance with, but will not necessarily be limited to, the following general criteria— (1) The equivalency of an accreditation organization's accreditation requirements of an entity to the comparable CMS requirements for the entity; (2) The organization's survey process to determine— (i) The composition of the survey team, surveyor qualifications, and the ability of the organization to provide continuing surveyor training; (ii) The comparability of survey procedures to those of State survey agencies, including survey frequency, and the ability to investigate and respond appropriately to complaints against accredited facilities; (iii) The organization's procedures for monitoring providers or suppliers found by the organization to be out of compliance with program requirements. These monitoring procedures are to be used only when the organization identifies noncompliance. If noncompliance is identified through validation surveys, the State survey agency monitors corrections as specified at §488.7(b)(3); (iv) The ability of the organization to report deficiencies to the surveyed facilities and respond to the facility's plan of correction in a timely manner; (v) The ability of the organization to provide CMS with electronic data in ASCII comparable code and reports necessary for effective validation and assessment of the organization survey process; (vi) The adequacy of staff and other resources; (vii) The organization's ability to provide adequate funding for performing required surveys; and (viii) The organization's policies with respect to whether surveys are announced or unannounced; and (3) The accreditation organization's agreement to provide CMS with a copy of the most current accreditation survey together with any other information related to the survey as CMS may require (including corrective action plans). (b) Notice and comment. (1) CMS will publish a proposed notice in the (2) CMS will publish a final notice in the (c) Effects of approval of an accreditation organization. CMS will deem providers and suppliers accredited by an approved accreditation organization to meet the Medicare conditions for which the approval of deeming authority has specifically been granted. The deeming authority will take effect 90 days following the publication of the final notice. (d) Continuing Federal oversight of equivalency of an accreditation organization and removal of deeming authority. This paragraph establishes specific criteria and procedures for continuing oversight and for removing the approval of deeming authority of a national accreditation organization. (1) Comparability review. CMS will compare the equivalency of an accreditation organization's accreditation requirements to the comparable CMS requirements if— (i) CMS imposes new requirements or changes its survey process; (ii) An accreditation organization proposes to adopt new requirements or change its survey process. An accreditation organization must provide written notification to CMS at least 30 days in advance of the effective date of any proposed changes in its accreditation requirements or survey process; and (iii) An accreditation organization's approval has been in effect for the maximum term specified by CMS in the final notice. (2) Validation review. Following the end of a validation review period, CMS will identify any accreditation programs for which— (i) Validation survey results indicate a rate of disparity between certifications of the accreditation organization and certification of the State agency of 20 percent or more; or (ii) Validation survey results, irrespective of the rate of disparity, indicate widespread or systematic problems in an organization's accreditation process that provide evidence that there is no longer reasonable assurance that accredited entities meet Medicare requirements. (3) Reapplication procedures. (i) Every six years, or sooner as determined by CMS, an approved accreditation organization must reapply for continued approval of deeming authority. CMS will notify the organization of the materials the organization must submit as part of the reapplication procedure. (ii) An accreditation organization that is not meeting the requirements of this subpart, as determined through a comparability review, must furnish CMS, upon request and at any time, with the reapplication materials CMS requests. CMS will establish a deadline by which the materials are to be submitted. (e) Notice. If a comparability or validation review reveals documentation that an accreditation organization is not meeting the requirements of this subpart, CMS will provide written notice to the organization indicating that its deeming authority approval may be in jeopardy and that a deeming authority review is being initiated. The notice provides the following information— (1) A statement of the requirements, instances, rates or patterns of discrepancies that were found as well as other related documentation; (2) An explanation of CMS's deeming authority review on which the final determination is based; (3) A description of the process available if the accreditation organization wishes an opportunity to explain or justify the findings made during the comparability or validation review; (4) A description of the possible actions that may be imposed by CMS based on the findings from the validation review; and (5) The reapplication materials the organization must submit and the deadline for their submission. (f) Deeming authority review. (1) CMS will conduct a review of an accreditation organization's accreditation program if the comparability or validation review produces findings as described at paragraph (d)(1) or (2), respectively, of this section. CMS will review as appropriate either or both— (i) The requirements of the accreditation organization; or (ii) The criteria described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section to reevaluate whether the accreditation organization continues to meet all these criteria. (2) If CMS determines, following the deeming authority review, that the accreditation organization has failed to adopt requirements comparable to CMS's or submit new requirements timely, the accreditation organization may be given a conditional approval of its deeming authority for a probationary period of up to 180 days to adopt comparable requirements. (3) If CMS determines, following the deeming authority review, that the rate of disparity identified during the validation review meets either of the criteria set forth in paragraph (d)(2) of this section CMS— (i) May give the accreditation organization conditional approval of its deeming authority during a probationary period of up to one year (whether or not there are also noncomparable requirements) that will be effective 30 days following the date of this determination; (ii) Will require the accreditation organization to release to CMS upon its request any facility-specific data that is required by CMS for continued monitoring: (iii) Will require the accreditation organization to provide CMS with a survey schedule for the purpose of intermittent onsite monitoring by CMS staff, State surveyors, or both; and (iv) Will publish in the Medicare Annual Report to Congress the name of any accreditation organization given a probationary period by CMS. (4) Within 60 days after the end of any probationary period, CMS will make a final determination as to whether or not an accreditation program continues to meet the criteria described at paragraph (a)(1) of this section and will issue an appropriate notice (including reasons for the determination) to the accreditation organization and affected providers or suppliers. This determination will be based on any of the following— (i) The evaluation of the most current validation survey and review findings. The evaluation must indicate an acceptable rate of disparity of less than 20 percent between the certifications of the accreditation organization and the certifications of the State agency as described at paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section in order for the accreditation organization to retain its approval; (ii) The evaluation of facility-specific data, as necessary, as well as other related information; (iii) The evaluation of an accreditation organization's surveyors in terms of qualifications, ongoing training composition of survey team, etc.; (iv) The evaluation of survey procedures; or (v) The accreditation requirements. (5) If the accreditation program has not made improvements acceptable to CMS during the probationary period, CMS may remove recognition of deemed authority effective 30 days from the date that it provides written notice to the organization that its deeming authority will be removed. (6) The existence of any validation review, deeming authority review, probationary period, or any other action by CMS, does not affect or limit the conducting of any validation survey. (7) CMS will publish a notice in the (8) After CMS removes approval of an accreditation organization's deeming authority, an affected provider's or supplier's deemed status continues in effect 60 days after the removal of approval. CMS may extend the period for an additional 60 days for a provider or supplier if it determines that the provider or supplier submitted an application within the initial 60 day timeframe to another approved accreditation organization or to CMS so that a certification of compliance with Medicare conditions can be determined. (9) Failure to comply with the timeframe requirements specified in paragraph (f)(8) of this section will jeopardize a provider's or supplier's participation in the Medicare program and where applicable in the Medicaid program. (g) If at any time CMS determines that the continued approval of deeming authority of any accreditation organization poses an immediate jeopardy to the patients of the entities accredited by that organization, or such continued approval otherwise constitutes a significant hazard to the public health, CMS may immediately withdraw the approval of deeming authority of that accreditation organization. (h) Any accreditation organization dissatisfied with a determination to remove its deeming authority may request a reconsideration of that determination in accordance with subpart D of this part. [58 FR 61841, Nov. 23, 1993]
Title 42: Public Health
PART 488—SURVEY, CERTIFICATION, AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 488.8 Federal review of accreditation organizations.
