US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 146a. —  Jurisdiction of suits by or against China Trade Act corporation.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 15USC146a]

 
                      TITLE 15--COMMERCE AND TRADE
 
                         CHAPTER 4--CHINA TRADE
 
Sec. 146a. Jurisdiction of suits by or against China Trade Act 
        corporation
        
    The Federal district courts shall have exclusive original 
jurisdiction of all suits to which a China Trade Act corporation, or a 
stockholder, director, or officer thereof in his capacity as such, is a 
party. Suit against the corporation may be brought in the United States 
District Court for the District of Columbia or in the Federal district 
court for any district in which the corporation has an agent and is 
engaged in doing business.

(Sept. 19, 1922, ch. 346, Sec. 20(a), formerly Sec. 20, 42 Stat. 855; 
renumbered Sec. 20(a), Feb. 26, 1925, ch. 345, Sec. 10, 43 Stat. 996; 
June 25, 1936, ch. 804, 49 Stat. 1921; Treaty of Jan. 11, 1943, 57 Stat. 
767; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 
139, Sec. 127, 63 Stat. 107.)

                          Codification

    Section comprises subsec. (a) of section 20 of act Sept. 19, 1922, 
as amended by act Feb. 26, 1925. Subsec. (b) of section 20 is classified 
to section 160 of this title.
    In the first sentence, the words ``(except as provided by the Act 
entitled `An Act creating a United States Court for China and 
prescribing the jurisdiction thereof,' approved June 30, 1906, as 
amended)'' have been omitted because that Act (formerly classified to 
sections 191 to 197, 199, 200, and 202 of Title 22, Foreign Relations 
and Intercourse) was repealed by act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 39, 62 
Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948.
    The provision in the second sentence that suits against the China 
Trade Act corporation might also be brought in the United States Court 
for China was omitted as that court is no longer in operation. By the 
treaty of Jan. 11, 1943, between the United States and China, the United 
States relinquished extraterritorial rights in China. See Codification 
note set out under section 142 of this title.
    Section was formerly classified to section 53 of Title 28 prior to 
the general revision and enactment of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial 
Procedure, by act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 1, 62 Stat. 869.

                         Change of Name

    Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 
1949, substituted ``United States District Court for the District of 
Columbia'' for ``district court of the United States for the District of 
Columbia''.
    Act June 25, 1936, changed name of ``Supreme Court of the District 
of Columbia'' to ``district court of the United States for the District 
of Columbia''.



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com