US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 204. —  Execution of transfers of copyright ownership.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 17USC204]

 
                          TITLE 17--COPYRIGHTS
 
               CHAPTER 2--COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER
 
Sec. 204. Execution of transfers of copyright ownership

    (a) A transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of 
law, is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or 
memorandum of the transfer, is in writing and signed by the owner of the 
rights conveyed or such owner's duly authorized agent.
    (b) A certificate of acknowledgement is not required for the 
validity of a transfer, but is prima facie evidence of the execution of 
the transfer if--
        (1) in the case of a transfer executed in the United States, the 
    certificate is issued by a person authorized to administer oaths 
    within the United States; or
        (2) in the case of a transfer executed in a foreign country, the 
    certificate is issued by a diplomatic or consular officer of the 
    United States, or by a person authorized to administer oaths whose 
    authority is proved by a certificate of such an officer.

(Pub. L. 94-553, title I, Sec. 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2570.)


                      Historical and Revision Notes

                        house report no. 94-1476

    Section 204 is a somewhat broadened and liberalized counterpart of 
sections 28 and 29 of the present statute [sections 28 and 29 of former 
title 17]. Under subsection (a), a transfer of copyright ownership 
(other than one brought about by operation of law) is valid only if 
there exists an instrument of conveyance, or alternatively a ``note or 
memorandum of the transfer,'' which is in writing and signed by the 
copyright owner ``or such owner's duly authorized agent.'' Subsection 
(b) makes clear that a notarial or consular acknowledgment is not 
essential to the validity of any transfer, whether executed in the 
United States or abroad. However, the subsection would liberalize the 
conditions under which certificates of acknowledgment of documents 
executed abroad are to be accorded prima facie weight, and would give 
the same weight to domestic acknowledgments under appropriate 
circumstances.



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com