US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 2518. —  Procedure for interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 18USC2518]

 
                 TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
 
                             PART I--CRIMES
 
    CHAPTER 119--WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND 
                   INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
 
Sec. 2518. Procedure for interception of wire, oral, or 
        electronic communications
        
    (1) Each application for an order authorizing or approving the 
interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication under this 
chapter shall be made in writing upon oath or affirmation to a judge of 
competent jurisdiction and shall state the applicant's authority to make 
such application. Each application shall include the following 
information:
        (a) the identity of the investigative or law enforcement officer 
    making the application, and the officer authorizing the application;
        (b) a full and complete statement of the facts and circumstances 
    relied upon by the applicant, to justify his belief that an order 
    should be issued, including (i) details as to the particular offense 
    that has been, is being, or is about to be committed, (ii) except as 
    provided in subsection (11), a particular description of the nature 
    and location of the facilities from which or the place where the 
    communication is to be intercepted, (iii) a particular description 
    of the type of communications sought to be intercepted, (iv) the 
    identity of the person, if known, committing the offense and whose 
    communications are to be intercepted;
        (c) a full and complete statement as to whether or not other 
    investigative procedures have been tried and failed or why they 
    reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too 
    dangerous;
        (d) a statement of the period of time for which the interception 
    is required to be maintained. If the nature of the investigation is 
    such that the authorization for interception should not 
    automatically terminate when the described type of communication has 
    been first obtained, a particular description of facts establishing 
    probable cause to believe that additional communications of the same 
    type will occur thereafter;
        (e) a full and complete statement of the facts concerning all 
    previous applications known to the individual authorizing and making 
    the application, made to any judge for authorization to intercept, 
    or for approval of interceptions of, wire, oral, or electronic 
    communications involving any of the same persons, facilities or 
    places specified in the application, and the action taken by the 
    judge on each such application; and
        (f) where the application is for the extension of an order, a 
    statement setting forth the results thus far obtained from the 
    interception, or a reasonable explanation of the failure to obtain 
    such results.

    (2) The judge may require the applicant to furnish additional 
testimony or documentary evidence in support of the application.
    (3) Upon such application the judge may enter an ex parte order, as 
requested or as modified, authorizing or approving interception of wire, 
oral, or electronic communications within the territorial jurisdiction 
of the court in which the judge is sitting (and outside that 
jurisdiction but within the United States in the case of a mobile 
interception device authorized by a Federal court within such 
jurisdiction), if the judge determines on the basis of the facts 
submitted by the applicant that--
        (a) there is probable cause for belief that an individual is 
    committing, has committed, or is about to commit a particular 
    offense enumerated in section 2516 of this chapter;
        (b) there is probable cause for belief that particular 
    communications concerning that offense will be obtained through such 
    interception;
        (c) normal investigative procedures have been tried and have 
    failed or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to 
    be too dangerous;
        (d) except as provided in subsection (11), there is probable 
    cause for belief that the facilities from which, or the place where, 
    the wire, oral, or electronic communications are to be intercepted 
    are being used, or are about to be used, in connection with the 
    commission of such offense, or are leased to, listed in the name of, 
    or commonly used by such person.

    (4) Each order authorizing or approving the interception of any 
wire, oral, or electronic communication under this chapter shall 
specify--
        (a) the identity of the person, if known, whose communications 
    are to be intercepted;
        (b) the nature and location of the communications facilities as 
    to which, or the place where, authority to intercept is granted;
        (c) a particular description of the type of communication sought 
    to be intercepted, and a statement of the particular offense to 
    which it relates;
        (d) the identity of the agency authorized to intercept the 
    communications, and of the person authorizing the application; and
        (e) the period of time during which such interception is 
    authorized, including a statement as to whether or not the 
    interception shall automatically terminate when the described 
    communication has been first obtained.

An order authorizing the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic 
communication under this chapter shall, upon request of the applicant, 
direct that a provider of wire or electronic communication service, 
landlord, custodian or other person shall furnish the applicant 
forthwith all information, facilities, and technical assistance 
necessary to accomplish the interception unobtrusively and with a 
minimum of interference with the services that such service provider, 
landlord, custodian, or person is according the person whose 
communications are to be intercepted. Any provider of wire or electronic 
communication service, landlord, custodian or other person furnishing 
such facilities or technical assistance shall be compensated therefor by 
the applicant for reasonable expenses incurred in providing such 
facilities or assistance. Pursuant to section 2522 of this chapter, an 
order may also be issued to enforce the assistance capability and 
capacity requirements under the Communications Assistance for Law 
Enforcement Act.
    (5) No order entered under this section may authorize or approve the 
interception of any wire, oral, or electronic communication for any 
period longer than is necessary to achieve the objective of the 
authorization, nor in any event longer than thirty days. Such thirty-day 
period begins on the earlier of the day on which the investigative or 
law enforcement officer first begins to conduct an interception under 
the order or ten days after the order is entered. Extensions of an order 
may be granted, but only upon application for an extension made in 
accordance with subsection (1) of this section and the court making the 
findings required by subsection (3) of this section. The period of 
extension shall be no longer than the authorizing judge deems necessary 
to achieve the purposes for which it was granted and in no event for 
longer than thirty days. Every order and extension thereof shall contain 
a provision that the authorization to intercept shall be executed as 
soon as practicable, shall be conducted in such a way as to minimize the 
interception of communications not otherwise subject to interception 
under this chapter, and must terminate upon attainment of the authorized 
objective, or in any event in thirty days. In the event the intercepted 
communication is in a code or foreign language, and an expert in that 
foreign language or code is not reasonably available during the 
interception period, minimization may be accomplished as soon as 
practicable after such interception. An interception under this chapter 
may be conducted in whole or in part by Government personnel, or by an 
individual operating under a contract with the Government, acting under 
the supervision of an investigative or law enforcement officer 
authorized to conduct the interception.
    (6) Whenever an order authorizing interception is entered pursuant 
to this chapter, the order may require reports to be made to the judge 
who issued the order showing what progress has been made toward 
achievement of the authorized objective and the need for continued 
interception. Such reports shall be made at such intervals as the judge 
may require.
    (7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any 
investigative or law enforcement officer, specially designated by the 
Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney 
General, or by the principal prosecuting attorney of any State or 
subdivision thereof acting pursuant to a statute of that State, who 
reasonably determines that--
        (a) an emergency situation exists that involves--
            (i) immediate danger of death or serious physical injury to 
        any person,
            (ii) conspiratorial activities threatening the national 
        security interest, or
            (iii) conspiratorial activities characteristic of organized 
        crime,

    that requires a wire, oral, or electronic communication to be 
    intercepted before an order authorizing such interception can, with 
    due diligence, be obtained, and
        (b) there are grounds upon which an order could be entered under 
    this chapter to authorize such interception,

may intercept such wire, oral, or electronic communication if an 
application for an order approving the interception is made in 
accordance with this section within forty-eight hours after the 
interception has occurred, or begins to occur. In the absence of an 
order, such interception shall immediately terminate when the 
communication sought is obtained or when the application for the order 
is denied, whichever is earlier. In the event such application for 
approval is denied, or in any other case where the interception is 
terminated without an order having been issued, the contents of any 
wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepted shall be treated as 
having been obtained in violation of this chapter, and an inventory 
shall be served as provided for in subsection (d) of this section on the 
person named in the application.
    (8)(a) The contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication 
intercepted by any means authorized by this chapter shall, if possible, 
be recorded on tape or wire or other comparable device. The recording of 
the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication under this 
subsection shall be done in such a way as will protect the recording 
from editing or other alterations. Immediately upon the expiration of 
the period of the order, or extensions thereof, such recordings shall be 
made available to the judge issuing such order and sealed under his 
directions. Custody of the recordings shall be wherever the judge 
orders. They shall not be destroyed except upon an order of the issuing 
or denying judge and in any event shall be kept for ten years. Duplicate 
recordings may be made for use or disclosure pursuant to the provisions 
of subsections (1) and (2) of section 2517 of this chapter for 
investigations. The presence of the seal provided for by this 
subsection, or a satisfactory explanation for the absence thereof, shall 
be a prerequisite for the use or disclosure of the contents of any wire, 
oral, or electronic communication or evidence derived therefrom under 
subsection (3) of section 2517.
    (b) Applications made and orders granted under this chapter shall be 
sealed by the judge. Custody of the applications and orders shall be 
wherever the judge directs. Such applications and orders shall be 
disclosed only upon a showing of good cause before a judge of competent 
jurisdiction and shall not be destroyed except on order of the issuing 
or denying judge, and in any event shall be kept for ten years.
    (c) Any violation of the provisions of this subsection may be 
punished as contempt of the issuing or denying judge.
    (d) Within a reasonable time but not later than ninety days after 
the filing of an application for an order of approval under section 
2518(7)(b) which is denied or the termination of the period of an order 
or extensions thereof, the issuing or denying judge shall cause to be 
served, on the persons named in the order or the application, and such 
other parties to intercepted communications as the judge may determine 
in his discretion that is in the interest of justice, an inventory which 
shall include notice of--
        (1) the fact of the entry of the order or the application;
        (2) the date of the entry and the period of authorized, approved 
    or disapproved interception, or the denial of the application; and
        (3) the fact that during the period wire, oral, or electronic 
    communications were or were not intercepted.

The judge, upon the filing of a motion, may in his discretion make 
available to such person or his counsel for inspection such portions of 
the intercepted communications, applications and orders as the judge 
determines to be in the interest of justice. On an ex parte showing of 
good cause to a judge of competent jurisdiction the serving of the 
inventory required by this subsection may be postponed.
    (9) The contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication 
intercepted pursuant to this chapter or evidence derived therefrom shall 
not be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any trial, 
hearing, or other proceeding in a Federal or State court unless each 
party, not less than ten days before the trial, hearing, or proceeding, 
has been furnished with a copy of the court order, and accompanying 
application, under which the interception was authorized or approved. 
This ten-day period may be waived by the judge if he finds that it was 
not possible to furnish the party with the above information ten days 
before the trial, hearing, or proceeding and that the party will not be 
prejudiced by the delay in receiving such information.
    (10)(a) Any aggrieved person in any trial, hearing, or proceeding in 
or before any court, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, or 
other authority of the United States, a State, or a political 
subdivision thereof, may move to suppress the contents of any wire or 
oral communication intercepted pursuant to this chapter, or evidence 
derived therefrom, on the grounds that--
        (i) the communication was unlawfully intercepted;
        (ii) the order of authorization or approval under which it was 
    intercepted is insufficient on its face; or
        (iii) the interception was not made in conformity with the order 
    of authorization or approval.

Such motion shall be made before the trial, hearing, or proceeding 
unless there was no opportunity to make such motion or the person was 
not aware of the grounds of the motion. If the motion is granted, the 
contents of the intercepted wire or oral communication, or evidence 
derived therefrom, shall be treated as having been obtained in violation 
of this chapter. The judge, upon the filing of such motion by the 
aggrieved person, may in his discretion make available to the aggrieved 
person or his counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted 
communication or evidence derived therefrom as the judge determines to 
be in the interests of justice.
    (b) In addition to any other right to appeal, the United States 
shall have the right to appeal from an order granting a motion to 
suppress made under paragraph (a) of this subsection, or the denial of 
an application for an order of approval, if the United States attorney 
shall certify to the judge or other official granting such motion or 
denying such application that the appeal is not taken for purposes of 
delay. Such appeal shall be taken within thirty days after the date the 
order was entered and shall be diligently prosecuted.
    (c) The remedies and sanctions described in this chapter with 
respect to the interception of electronic communications are the only 
judicial remedies and sanctions for nonconstitutional violations of this 
chapter involving such communications.
    (11) The requirements of subsections (1)(b)(ii) and (3)(d) of this 
section relating to the specification of the facilities from which, or 
the place where, the communication is to be intercepted do not apply 
if--
        (a) in the case of an application with respect to the 
    interception of an oral communication--
            (i) the application is by a Federal investigative or law 
        enforcement officer and is approved by the Attorney General, the 
        Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, an 
        Assistant Attorney General, or an acting Assistant Attorney 
        General;
            (ii) the application contains a full and complete statement 
        as to why such specification is not practical and identifies the 
        person committing the offense and whose communications are to be 
        intercepted; and
            (iii) the judge finds that such specification is not 
        practical; and

        (b) in the case of an application with respect to a wire or 
    electronic communication--
            (i) the application is by a Federal investigative or law 
        enforcement officer and is approved by the Attorney General, the 
        Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, an 
        Assistant Attorney General, or an acting Assistant Attorney 
        General;
            (ii) the application identifies the person believed to be 
        committing the offense and whose communications are to be 
        intercepted and the applicant makes a showing that there is 
        probable cause to believe that the person's actions could have 
        the effect of thwarting interception from a specified facility;
            (iii) the judge finds that such showing has been adequately 
        made; and
            (iv) the order authorizing or approving the interception is 
        limited to interception only for such time as it is reasonable 
        to presume that the person identified in the application is or 
        was reasonably proximate to the instrument through which such 
        communication will be or was transmitted.

    (12) An interception of a communication under an order with respect 
to which the requirements of subsections (1)(b)(ii) and (3)(d) of this 
section do not apply by reason of subsection (11)(a) shall not begin 
until the place where the communication is to be intercepted is 
ascertained by the person implementing the interception order. A 
provider of wire or electronic communications service that has received 
an order as provided for in subsection (11)(b) may move the court to 
modify or quash the order on the ground that its assistance with respect 
to the interception cannot be performed in a timely or reasonable 
fashion. The court, upon notice to the government, shall decide such a 
motion expeditiously.

(Added Pub. L. 90-351, title III, Sec. 802, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 218; 
amended Pub. L. 91-358, title II, Sec. 211(b), July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 
654; Pub. L. 95-511, title II, Sec. 201(d)-(g), Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 
1797, 1798; Pub. L. 98-473, title II, Sec. 1203(a), (b), Oct. 12, 1984, 
98 Stat. 2152; Pub. L. 99-508, title I, Secs. 101(c)(1)(A), (8), (e), 
106(a)-(d)(3), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1851-1853, 1856, 1857; Pub. L. 
103-414, title II, Sec. 201(b)(1), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4290; Pub. 
L. 105-272, title VI, Sec. 604, Oct. 20, 1998, 112 Stat. 2413.)

                       References in Text

    The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, referred to 
in par. (4), is title I of Pub. L. 103-414, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 
4279, which is classified generally to subchapter I (Sec. 1001 et seq.) 
of chapter 9 of Title 47, Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs. 
For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title 
note set out under section 1001 of Title 47 and Tables.


                               Amendments

    1998--Par. (11)(b)(ii). Pub. L. 105-272, Sec. 604(a)(1), substituted 
``that there is probable cause to believe that the person's actions 
could have the effect of thwarting interception from a specified 
facility;'' for ``of a purpose, on the part of that person, to thwart 
interception by changing facilities; and''.
    Par. (11)(b)(iii). Pub. L. 105-272, Sec. 604(a)(2), substituted 
``such showing has been adequately made; and'' for ``such purpose has 
been adequately shown.''
    Par. (11)(b)(iv). Pub. L. 105-272, Sec. 604(a)(3), added cl. (iv).
    Par. (12). Pub. L. 105-272, Sec. 604(b), substituted ``by reason of 
subsection (11)(a)'' for ``by reason of subsection (11)'', struck out 
``the facilities from which, or'' after ``shall not begin until'', and 
struck out comma after ``the place where''.
    1994--Par. (4). Pub. L. 103-414 inserted at end of concluding 
provisions ``Pursuant to section 2522 of this chapter, an order may also 
be issued to enforce the assistance capability and capacity requirements 
under the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act.''
    1986--Pub. L. 99-508, Sec. 101(c)(1)(A), substituted ``wire, oral, 
or electronic'' for ``wire or oral'' in section catchline.
    Par. (1). Pub. L. 99-508, Sec. 101(c)(1)(A), substituted ``wire, 
oral, or electronic'' for ``wire or oral'' in introductory provisions.
    Par. (1)(b)(ii). Pub. L. 99-508, Sec. 106(d)(1), inserted ``except 
as provided in subsection (11),''.
    Par. (1)(e). Pub. L. 99-508, Sec. 101(c)(1)(A), substituted ``wire, 
oral, or electronic'' for ``wire or oral''.
    Par. (3). Pub. L. 99-508, Secs. 101(c)(1)(A), 106(a), in 
introductory provisions, substituted ``wire, oral, or electronic'' for 
``wire or oral'' and inserted ``(and outside that jurisdiction but 
within the United States in the case of a mobile interception device 
authorized by a Federal court within such jurisdiction)''.
    Par. (3)(d). Pub. L. 99-508, Secs. 101(c)(1)(A), 106(d)(2), inserted 
``except as provided in subsection (11),'' and substituted ``wire, oral, 
or electronic'' for ``wire or oral''.
    Par. (4). Pub. L. 99-508, Secs. 101(c)(1)(A), (8), 106(b), 
substituted ``wire, oral, or electronic'' for ``wire or oral'' wherever 
appearing and, in closing provisions, substituted ``provider of wire or 
electronic communication service'' for ``communication common carrier'' 
wherever appearing, ``such service provider'' for ``such carrier'', and 
``for reasonable expenses incurred in providing such facilities or 
assistance'' for ``at the prevailing rates''.
    Par. (5). Pub. L. 99-508, Secs. 101(c)(1)(A), 106(c), substituted 
``wire, oral, or electronic'' for ``wire or oral'' and inserted 
provisions which related to beginning of thirty-day period, minimization 
where intercepted communication is in code or foreign language and 
expert in that code or foreign language is not immediately available, 
and conduct of interception by Government personnel or by individual 
operating under Government contract, acting under supervision of 
investigative or law enforcement officer authorized to conduct 
interception.
    Pars. (7), (8)(a), (d)(3), (9). Pub. L. 99-508, Sec. 101(c)(1)(A), 
substituted ``wire, oral, or electronic'' for ``wire or oral'' wherever 
appearing.
    Par. (10)(c). Pub. L. 99-508, Sec. 101(e), added subpar. (c).
    Pars. (11), (12). Pub. L. 99-508, Sec. 106(d)(3), added pars. (11) 
and (12).
    1984--Par. (7). Pub. L. 98-473, Sec. 1203(a), inserted ``, the 
Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General,'' after 
``Attorney General'' in provisions preceding subpar. (a).
    Par. (7)(a). Pub. L. 98-473, Sec. 1203(b), amended subpar. (a) 
generally, adding cl. (i) and designated existing provisions as cls. 
(ii) and (iii).
    1978--Par. (1). Pub. L. 95-511, Sec. 201(d), inserted ``under this 
chapter'' after ``communication''.
    Par. (4). Pub. L. 95-511, Sec. 201(e), inserted ``under this 
chapter'' after ``wire or oral communication'' wherever appearing.
    Par. (9). Pub. L. 95-511, Sec. 201(e), substituted ``any wire or 
oral communication intercepted pursuant to this chapter'' for ``any 
intercepted wire or oral communication''.
    Par. (10). Pub. L. 95-511, Sec. 201(g), substituted ``any wire or 
oral communication intercepted pursuant to this chapter,'' for ``any 
intercepted wire or oral communication,''.
    1970--Par. (4). Pub. L. 91-358 inserted the provision that, upon the 
request of the applicant, an order authorizing the interception of a 
wire or oral communication direct that a communication common carrier, 
landlord, custodian, or other person furnish the applicant with all 
information, facilities, and technical assistance necessary to 
accomplish the interception unobtrusively and with a minimum of 
interference with the services provided.


                    Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 99-508 effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, 
and, in case of conduct pursuant to court order or extension, applicable 
only with respect to court orders and extensions made after such date, 
with special rule for State authorizations of interceptions, see section 
111 of Pub. L. 99-508, set out as a note under section 2510 of this 
title.


                    Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 95-511 effective Oct. 25, 1978, except as 
specifically provided, see section 401 of Pub. L. 95-511, set out as an 
Effective Date note under section 1801 of Title 50, War and National 
Defense.


                    Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 91-358 effective on first day of seventh 
calendar month which begins after July 29, 1970, see section 901(a) of 
Pub. L. 91-358.

                  Section Referred to in Other Sections

    This section is referred to in sections 2511, 2516, 2519, 2520, 
2701, 2707 of this title; title 47 section 1002.



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com