Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2022 > February 2022 Decisions >

A.C. No. 8111 - ADELITA S. VILLAMOR, Complainant, v. ATTY. ELY GALLAND A. JUMAO-AS, Respondent:







A.C. No. 8111 - ADELITA S. VILLAMOR, Complainant, v. ATTY. ELY GALLAND A. JUMAO-AS, Respondent

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

A.C. No. 8111. February 15, 2022

ADELITA S. VILLAMOR, Complainant, v. ATTY. ELY GALLAND A. JUMAO-AS, Respondent.

R E S O L U T I O N

HERNANDO, J.:

For the Court's En Banc's consideration is respondent Atty. Ely Galland A. Jumao-as (Jumao-as)' Motion to Reduce Penalty.1

On December 9, 2020, the Court suspended Atty. Jumao-as from the practice of law for two years for violating Canon 15, Rule 15.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), which provides:

Canon 15  A lawyer shall observe candor, fairness and loyalty in all his dealings and transactions with his client.

x x x x

Rule 15.03  A lawyer shall not represent conflicting interests except by written consent of all concerned given after a full disclosure of the facts.

Atty. Jumao-as was found to have represented conflicting interests by committing the following acts: he facilitated the incorporation of AEV Villamor Credit, Inc. (AEV), complainant Adelita S. Villamor (Villamor)'s lending company; he persuaded Villamor to borrow money from one Debbie Yu (Yu) to beef up AEV's capital; he left AEV to join 3 E's Debt Equity Grant Co. (3 E's), a lending company owned by Yu; he incited a diaspora of AEV's collectors to join 3 E's; he told AEV's collectors to remit their collections to 3 E's since Villamor owed Yu; and he even sent a demand letter to Villamor, for and in behalf of Yu, demanding that Villamor pay the amount she owed Yu.2

Atty. Jumao-as now moves to reduce his penalty, either to a stern warning or a two-month suspension. Humbly admitting to his faults, he prays that this Court consider the reasons quoted hereunder for the mitigation of his administrative punishment:

  1. I was a new lawyer at that time and I fall short of my professional judgment;cralawlawlibrary

  2. Long before the promulgation of this case, I already realized my mistake during the mediation stage of my case x x x. I quickly offered to pay the debts of [Villamor] and I paid her debt [to Yu] x x x I also brokered the reconciliation of complainant with [her] general manager;cralawlawlibrary

  3. Even though the Affidavit of Desistance cannot dismiss the administrative case, I pray that it will be considered as a mitigating factor x x x;cralawlawlibrary

  4. The bounced checks of the complainant did not reach to court because I personally settled her obligations;cralawlawlibrary

  5. In the spirit of compassion especially during this time of pandemic where the means of living is difficult to meet, I plead for consideration to shorten my suspension.3

The Court treats Atty. Jumao-as' Motion to Reduce Penalty as a motion for reconsideration, and grants the same and accordingly reduces the penalty originally meted to Atty. Jumao-as.

His speedy initiative to make amends and take responsibility of the entire debt of Villamor to Yu in the amount of P650,000.00 is by all means remarkable. He also expended extraordinary efforts to straighten out the corporate scuffles involving him and complainant Villamor and they have resumed their business dealings in good terms. Grave though his transgressions may have been, the sincerity of Atty. Jumao-as' remorse is reflected in his words and actions, which impresses this Court.

These acts of contrition, however, will not reduce Atty. Jumao-as' administrative liability to the full extent that he desires.

As he says in his Motion to Reduce Penalty, Atty. Jumao-as may truly have been incapable to spot the beginnings of attorney-client relationships and conflicting interests. However, lawyers such as he can never effectively claim legal ignorance. That he violated his oath as a lawyer is already a permanent dent on his record. His misdeeds towards Villamor must have put the image of the Bar and its members in some degree of embarrassment. He may have been forgiven by his complainant, but the disrepute to the legal profession that he had caused cannot simply be repaired by a mere warning or serving a short-lived suspension from law practice.

The Court turns to a case factually-similar to the one at hand for guidance.

In Legaspi v. Atty. Gonzales,4 complainant therein consulted respondent attorney how to eject an illegal settler who refuses to leave their land. While she never formally engaged respondent's legal services in her personal capacity, complainant still relayed to respondent the details of her quandary. Later, complainant discovered that respondent had become the counsel defending the same illegal settler in an unlawful detainer case filed by complainant's realty development company. The unlawful detainer case ended in an amicable settlement  the illegal settler received money from complainant's company and a parcel of land owned by complainant. Respondent even had a share in the settlement money from the illegal settler. Determining his administrative culpability for advocating conflicting interests, the Court sanctioned the erring lawyer with a year-long suspension from the practice of law.

All told, the Court finds good reason in jurisprudence and in fact to reconsider its previous administrative sentence of suspension for two years upon Atty. Jumao-as. He shall remain suspended from the practice of law, but for the shorter period of one year.

ACCORDINGLY, respondent Atty. Ely Galland A. Jumao-as' Motion to Reduce Penalty is TREATED as a Motion for Reconsideration and the same is GRANTED IN PART. The Court's December 9, 2020 Decision in this case is MODIFIED, in that respondent is SUSPENDED from the practice of law for the reduced period of one year and WARNED that a repetition of the same or similar acts will be dealt with more severely.

Let copies of this Resolution be furnished to the Office of the Bar Confidant, to be appended to the personal record of Atty. Ely Galland A. Jumao-as as an attorney-at-law; to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines; and to the Office of the Court Administrator for dissemination to all courts throughout the country for their guidance and information.

SO ORDERED.

Gesmundo, C.J., Perlas-Bernabe, Leonen, Caguioa, Lazaro-Javier, Inting, Zalameda, M. Lopez, Gaerlan, Rosario, J. Lopez, Dimaampao, and Marquez, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:


1 Temporary rollo, unpaginated.

2 Rollo, pp. 219-222.

3 Temporary rollo, unpaginated.

4 A.C. No. 12076, June 22, 2020.

cralawredlibrary



Back to Home | Back to Main





chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-2022 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 217097 - ROLANDO UY Y SAYAN ALIAS "NONOY," Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 233867 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. XXX,[1] ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • G.R. No. 219495 - REYNALDO P. CABATAN, Petitioner, v. SOUTHEAST ASIA SHIPPING CORP./ ATTY. ROMEO DALUSONG AND/OR MARITIME MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 248492 - THELMA DUMPIT-MURILLO, Petitioner, v. CAREER EXECUTIVE SERVICE BOARD, REPRESENTED BY MARIA ANTHONETTE VELASCO--ALLONES AND/OR ARTURO M. LACHICA, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 249195 - ROMMEL S. ALENAJE,* Petitioner, v. C.F. SHARP CREW MANAGEMENT, INC., REEDEREI CLAUS-PETER OFFEN (GMBH & CO.) AND ROBERTO B. DAVANTES, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 251636 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ORLANDO CONSTANTINO, ANTONIO ALEGADO, ROMEO CABILES, LUZVIMINDA CABILES, LENETO BONOCAN, ARTURO L. NUEVA, NORMA C. LUPAS, MERCY B. GALABIN, LUZVIMINDA DIAPOLET, CLARA RAMIREZ, AND ELVIE ARCEBAR, Accused-Appellants.

  • G.R. No. 254021 - PHILIPPINE BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS, Petitioner, v. PHILIPPINE BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (PBCOMEA), Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 232336 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARNEL VINLUAN Y LICLICAN A.K.A. "URBON," ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • G.R. No. 207159 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF EDUARDO BOOC, MERCEDES BOOC, AURELIA BOOC, PEDRO BOOC, FLORENTINO BOOC, AND FELICIANA BOOC,* RESPONDENTS.

  • G.R. No. 231042 - ARTURO O. MI?AO, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN (MINDANAO), Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 211348 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. PHILIPPINE BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 257276 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. XXX[1] ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • G.R. No. 240957 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS (DPWH), Petitioner, v. ALATHEA H. SINENSE, FLORENTINO DIANA, PACIFIC REHOUSE CORPORATION AND PHILIPPINE ESTATES CORPORATION, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 214435 - PROFESSIONAL REGULATION COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. DAYAMON DIDATO ALO, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 206404 - CONCEPCION CHUA GAW, Petitioner, v. SUY BEN CHUA AND FELISA CHUA, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 207828 - SRL INTERNATIONAL MANPOWER AGENCY, REPRESENTED BY SEVILLA SARAH SORITA AND AKKILA CO., LTD., UAE AND/OR AL SALMEEN, Petitioners, v. PEDRO S. YARZA, JR., Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 244048 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. XXX,[1] ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • G.R. No. 240810 - GLORIA PAJE, LOLITA GOMEZ, MIRIAM CATACUTAN, ESTRELLA ZAPATA, GLORIA SUMANG, JUANITA JULIETA DINGAL, MYRA AMANTE, AND FE S. BERNARDO, Petitioners, v. SPIC N' SPAN SERVICE CORPORATION, Respondent

  • G.R. No. 246868 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. ANGELIQUE PEARL O. CLAUR AND MARK A. CLAUR, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 252861 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALEXANDER OLPINDO Y REYES, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 222226 - FE J. MORADA, Petitioner, v. RANDY RIAS, EX-O ROLLY CEBU, DESK OFFICER ROMY DONALDO, DESK OFFICER FERNANDO DOMINGO AND OTHER JOHN DOES OF BARANGAY 176, CALOOCAN CITY, Respondents.

  • UDK-16915 - JOSEPH ROBLE PE?AS Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, REPRESENTED BY THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE UNIT RESPONDENT.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-11-2289 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 11-3656-RTJ) - IN RE: ANONYMOUS LETTER DATED AUGUST 12, 2010, COMPLAINING AGAINST JUDGE OFELIA T. PINTO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 60, ANGELES CITY, PAMPANGA

  • A.C. No. 8111 - ADELITA S. VILLAMOR, Complainant, v. ATTY. ELY GALLAND A. JUMAO-AS, Respondent

  • A.M. No. RTJ-14-2369 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 12-3907-RTJ) - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY LEILA M. DE LIMA, Complainant, v. ROLANDO G. MISLANG, PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF PASIG CITY, BRANCH 167, Respondent.[A.M. No. RTJ-14-2372 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 11-3736-RTJ), February 15, 2022]HOME DEVELOPMENT MUTUAL FUND, REPRESENTED BY ATTY. JOSE ROBERTO F. PO, Complainant, v. ROLANDO G. MISLANG, PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF PASIG CITY, BRANCH 167, Respondent

  • G.R. Nos. 214336-37 - QUIRINO M. LIBUNAO, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 239878 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN (FIFTH DIVISION), ALFONSO SERVANA CASURRA, LEONARDO LUIB EDERA, JR., JOCELYN ELEAZAR MONTEROS, MARIA SEPARA GEOTINA, ARMANDO MAPA ELUMBA, CARLO REYNALDO FAROLAN LOZADA, JR., AND ROSEMARIE V. PALACIO, Respondents.

  • A.C. No. 13131 - HOME GUARANTY CORPORATION, Complainant, v. ATTY. LAMBERTO T. TAGAYUNA, ATTY. JOSE A. GANGAN, ATTY. ELMAR A. PANOPIO, AND ATTY. RENATO DE PANO, JR., Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 230502 - LUISITO C. REYES, Petitioner, v. JEBSENS MARITIME, INC. AND ALFA SHIP & CREW MANAGEMENT GMBH, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 202029 - ISABELO CABALHIN, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES BONIFACIO LANSUELA AND ISIDRA LANSUELA,* RESPONDENTS.

  • G.R. No. 214933 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. FIRST GAS POWER CORPORATION, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 244374 - PUREGOLD PRICE CLUB, INC., Petitioner, v. COURT OF APPEALS AND RENATO M. CRUZ, JR., Respondents

  • G.R. No. 230861 - ASIAN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

  • G.R. No. 218663 - MUNICIPALITY OF CORELLA, REPRESENTED BY MAYOR JOSE NICANOR D. TOCMO, Petitioner, v. PHILKONSTRAK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND VITO RAPAL, Respondents.

  • A.M. No. 18-07-142-RTC - RE: REPORTS ON THE ERAFFLE PROCEDURE IN THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MANILA

  • G.R. No. 230784 - HEIRS OF ANGEL YADAO, NAMELY: RUFINA YADAO, ETHERLYN YADAO-YASA?A, RYANTH YADAO, RUTH ANN YADAO-MANGIBUNONG, DINA JOYCE YADAO-INES, AND ANGEL YADAO, JR.; HEIRS OF JOSEFINA IDICA-YADAO, NAMELY: LOURDES YADAO--APOSTOL AND AURORA YADAO; HEIRS OF OFELIA YADAO-NACENO, NAMELY: TEODULFO NACENO, JR., AILEEN NACENO, AND IRMA NACENO-AGPAOA, Petitioners, v. HEIRS OF JUAN CALETINA, NAMELY: HOSPICIO CALETINA, JR., ANICETO CALETINA, AND FLORIDA CALETINA, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 247522 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZORAIDA MARIANO A.K.A. NORA, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 238041 - BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF CHARLES B. MITICH a.k.a. CHARLIE MITICH AND JAMES L. KENNEDY, TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF CHARLES B. MITICH a.k.a. CHARLIE MITICH, Petitioners, v. MERCANTILE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Respondent.[G.R. No. 238502]MERCANTILE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF CHARLES B. MITICH a.k.a. CHARLIE MITICH AND JAMES L. KENNEDY, TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF CHARLES B. MITICH a.k.a. CHARLIE MITICH, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 234851 - PAOLO ANTHONY C. DE JESUS, Petitioner, v. DR. ROMEO F. UYLOAN, SUBSTITUTED BY HIS WIFE SALVACION UYLOAN, ASIAN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER AND DR. JOHN FRANCOIS OJEDA, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 246313 - PHILIPPINE CHARITY SWEEPSTAKES OFFICE, REMELIZA M. GABUYO, ET AL., Petitioners, v. THE COMMISSION ON AUDIT, Respondent.

  • G.R. Nos. 225568-70* - LILYBETH R. PEREZ, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 252411 - METRO LAUNDRY SERVICES, REPRESENTED BY ROWELA T. TINDOG, HEIR OF PROPRIETOR, MS. ELIZABETH T. TINDOG, Petitioner, v. THE COMMISSION PROPER, COMMISSION ON AUDIT, AND THE CITY OF MANILA, Respondents

  • G.R. No. 214071 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COUNCIL, Petitioner, v. HON. ANTONIO M. EUGENIO, JR., AS THE FORMER PRESIDING JUDGE OF BRANCH 24, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, CITY OF MANILA; HON. LYLIHA L. ABELLA-AQUINO, AS ACTING PRESIDING JUDGE OF BRANCH 24, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, CITY OF MANILA; THE ESTATE OF TERESITA ROJO CORPUS; AND TERESITA GOMEZ, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 213207 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. PASIG RIZAL CO., INC.,* RESPONDENT.

  • G.R. Nos. 235965-66 - RENE C. FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. SANDIGANBAYAN, SPECIAL THIRD DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN REPRESENTED BY THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR AND PHILIPPINE AMUSEMENT AND GAMING CORPORATION, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 253724 - PELAGIO T. RICALDE, OLIVER B. BUTALID, EFREN V. LEA?O, BOBBY G. FONDEVILLA, AND ESTELLA F. JIMENEZ, Petitioners, v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL G. AGUINALDO, COMMISSIONER JOSE A. FABIA, COMMISSIONER ROLAND C. PONDOC, DIRECTOR MA. CORAZON S. GOMEZ, SUPERVISING AUDITOR MANUEL A. BAES, AND AUDIT TEAM LEADER LIBRADA R. SANTELICES, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 211281 - LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (LRTA), Petitioner, v. JOY MART CONSOLIDATED INC.,* AND ISETANN DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. RESPONDENTS.[G.R. No. 212602]JOY MART CONSOLIDATED INC., AND ISETANN DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., Petitioners, v. LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (LRTA) AND PHOENIX OMEGA DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 229265 - SILVINO B. MATOBATO, SR., Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent. [G.R. No. 229624] WALTER B. BUCAO AND CIRILA A. ENGBINO, Petitioners, v. HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN-SPECIAL FIFTH DIVISION AND PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 207606 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, Petitioner, v. TEODORA T. HERMOSURA, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 210928 - REX G. RICO, Petitioner, v. UNION BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 214102 - JONATHAN G. MONTERDE AND ROY C. CONAG, Petitioners, v. BAYANI H. JACINTO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS GRAFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OFFICER III, GERARD A. MOSQUERA,[1] IN HIS CAPACITY AS DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR LUZON, CONCHITA CARPIO--MORALES, IN HER CAPACITY AS OMBUDSMAN OF THE PHILIPPINES, AND EVELYN A. CONAG, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 239313 - CESAR M. CALINGASAN,* Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 252226 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROMMEL DELA CRUZ Y MENDOZA, Accused-Appellant

  • G.R. No. 254381 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GILBERT ALEGRE Y NAZARAL, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 253428 - GUERRERO ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. LEVISTE & GUERRERO REALTY CORPORATION AND THE HEIRS OF CONRAD C. LEVISTE, AS REPRESENTED BY LAURO S. LEVISTE II, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 254622 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARKO PULGADO Y MAGNO A.K.A. "MAKO," ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • G.R. No. 254254 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. XXX,[1] ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • G.R. No. 256878 - RODELIO R. ONIA, Petitioner, v. LEONIS NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC., WORLD MARITIME CO. LTD., CAPT. HERNANI P. FEUSCA, FELIX ANDRADA, RICARDO NOLLEDO, RYO MATSUNAGA, TAKASHI UTO, VALERIANO R. DEL ROSARIO, MARY JEAN MADRENERO, AND JENNIFER E. CERRADA, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 254697 - TRAVELOKA PHILIPPINES, INC. AND YADY GUITANA, Petitioners, v. PONCEVIC CAPINO CEBALLOS, JR., Respondent

  • G.R. No. 247824 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ORLANDO PADILLA AND DANILO PADILLA, Accused-Appellants.

  • G.R. No. 218652 - RODRIGO DERIQUITO VILLANUEVA, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.