ChanRobles Virtual law Library








GO TO FULL LIST OF DECISIONS and RESOLUTIONS


chanrobles.com - PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS - ON-LINE

cralaw_scdecisions_separator.NHAD



SECOND DIVISION

.
.

GRIO LENDING SERVICES,
            Complainant,

A.M. No. P-03-1757
(Formerly A.M. No. OCA-IPI-02-1527-P)
December 10, 2003

-versus-


 

SALVACION SERMONIA, CLERK IV,REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 26, ILOILO CITY,

                       Respondent.
 
 

R E S O L U T I O N


CALLEJO, SR., J.:


Before the Court is the verified complaint dated November 6, 2002, filed against Salvacion Sermonia, Clerk IV of the Regional Trial Court of Iloilo City, Branch 26, for willful failure to pay just debts.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

The verified complaint was filed by Mitchill Grio, who alleged that on November 5, 1999, respondent Sermonia obtained loans from the Grio Lending Services in the total amount of forty thousand pesos (P40,000.00) payable in installments. When the loans became due, and upon demand by the complainant, the respondent issued postdated checks in favor of the latter as follows:chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

              Check No.       Date       Amount
chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
Pilipinas Bank Check

        No. 0040325             March 31, 2000         P20,000.00
              0040326             March 31, 2000         P20,000.00
              0040327             April 1, 2000              P2,000.00
              0040328             April 1, 2000              P2,000.00
                              —————
                     Total P44,000.00[1]

chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
When the checks were presented for encashment, however, these were dishonored by the bank with the notation "account closed" stamped thereon. Despite repeated demands on the respondent, she failed and refused to pay her obligation. Consequently, the complainant was constrained to file the present administrative complaint.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

In her Comment dated July 4, 2003, the respondent averred that she had already explained to the complainant her financial predicament and requested that she (the respondent) be given more time to pay her obligation. Finding the respondent's explanation acceptable, the complainant agreed to withdraw her complaint against the respondent. Attached to the respondent's comment are the complainant's Affidavit of Desistance dated December 2, 2002, and her letter of even date addressed to Executive Judge Tito G. Gustilo, RTC of Iloilo City, requesting for the withdrawal of the complaint she filed against the respondent. The complainant alleged that she and the respondent had reached an amicable settlement and the latter had made arrangements for the payment of her obligation.
 chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
Upon evaluation of the verified complaint and the comment thereon, Deputy Court Administrator Zenaida N. Elepaño recommended that the respondent be reprimanded and severely warned to be more circumspect in the conduct of her activities as a court employee, and to observe strict propriety and decorum in dealing with other people.[2]chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

The Court agrees with and adopts the foregoing recommendation.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

As correctly pointed out by Deputy Court Administrator Elepaño, despite the amicable settlement reached by the parties, the respondent should nonetheless be held administratively liable for her actuations. Significantly, it was only when the verified complaint was filed against her that respondent exerted efforts to make arrangements to pay her obligation to the complainant. Before the filing of the complaint, the respondent consistently ignored the complainant's repeated demands.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

The respondent is, thus, liable under Section 46, Chapter 7, Title I, Subtitle A, Book V of the Administrative Code of 1987 (Executive Order No. 292) which covers the respondent as a court personnel. The said provision reads in part:chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

Sec. 46. Discipline: General Provisions. — (a) No officer or employee in the Civil Service shall be suspended or dismissed except for cause as provided by law and after due process.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

x     x     x               x     x     x               x     x     x

(b) The following shall be grounds for disciplinary action:chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

x     x     x               x     x     x               x     x     xchanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

(22) Willful failure to pay just debts or willful failure to pay taxes to the government  x     x     xchanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
Further, Section 23, Rule XIV of the Omnibus Rules Implementing the 1987 Administrative Code defines "just debts" as including those "claims the existence and justness of which are admitted by the debtor." It cannot be gainsaid that the respondent admitted the existence of her debt to the complainant in this case.
 chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
The same rule classifies the willful failure to pay just debts as a light offense and prescribes the penalty of reprimand for the first offense, suspension for one (1) to thirty (30) days for the second offense, and dismissal for the third offense. Apparently, this is the respondent's first offense; hence, the penalty of reprimand is proper. It must be stressed that the penalty imposed by the law is not directed at the respondent's private life but at her actuation unbecoming a public official.[3]
 chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
It bears stressing at this point that employees of the judiciary should be living examples of uprightness not only in the performance of official duties but also in their personal and private dealing with other people so as to preserve at all times the good name and standing of the courts in the community.[4]
 chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
WHEREFORE, respondent Salvacion Sermonia, Clerk IV of the Regional Trial Court of Iloilo City, Branch 26, is REPRIMANDED for her willful failure to pay just debts, which amounts to conduct unbecoming a court employee. The commission of the same or similar acts in the future will be dealt with more severely.
 chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
SO ORDERED.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

Puno, Quisumbing, Austria-Martinez and Tinga, JJ., concur.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
 
 


____________________________

Endnotes:
 

[1] Rollo, p. 1.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
[2] Id. at 19.chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
[3] Uy vs. Magallanes, Jr., 380 SCRA 414 (2002).chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred
[4] Santelices vs. Samar, 373 SCRA 78 (2002).chanrobles virtuallaw libraryred

 Back to Top   -   Back to Main Index   -   Back to Table of Contents -2003 SC Decisions   -   Back to Home


 






































chanrobles.com




ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com