32 C.F.R. Subpart J—Environmental Pollution Prevention, Control, and Abatement Report (RCS DD-I&L (SA) 1383)


Title 32 - National Defense


Title 32: National Defense
PART 650—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT (AR 200–1)

Browse Previous

Subpart J—Environmental Pollution Prevention, Control, and Abatement Report (RCS DD-I&L (SA) 1383)

General

§ 650.231   Purpose.

(a) This chapter provides reporting procedures to be followed within the Department of the Army to control environmental pollution from existing facilities as contained in section 3(a) (3) Executive Order 11752 of December 17, 1973, entitled, “Prevention, Control and Abatement of Environmental Pollution at Federal Facilities.” This section of the Executive Order provides that “Heads of Federal agencies shall, with regard to all facilities under their jurisdiction in the United States:  *  *  *. (3) Present to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), annually, a plan to provide for such improvement in the design, construction, management, operation, and maintenance of existing facilities as may be necessary to meet applicable standards specified  *  *  *”

(b) The report described herein will be the principal mechanism for identifying pollution control projects and those resources needed to effectively execute installation and major command Environmental Programs. Properly defined information presented in this report can be used as a basis for necessary programing and budget actions by DA and major commands.

(c) These instruction implement OMB Circular A-106, dated 31 Dec 74, which supersedes OMB Circular A-78 and A-81, dated 18 May 70.

§ 650.232   Explanation of terms.

(a) The terms used herein will be the same as those defined in chapter 1.

(b) The term “project” will mean an action to achieve needed corrective measures relative to identified environmental pollution sources.

(c) The term “cost” will mean the amount of funds required to install the necessary environmental protection measures. These funds include the capital costs of structures and equipment, irrespective of the appropriation chargeable, but not the annual maintenance and operating costs.

§ 650.233   Applicability.

Each active, semiactive and Army Reserve installation operated by or for the Department of the Army, and National Guard facilities/sites supported by Federally appropriated funds in the Continental United States; Alaska and Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Panama Canal Zone, and the Trust Territories of the Pacific, whether Army-controlled or under jurisdiction of the Army by lease or similar instrument, where environmental protection measures do not meet the current requirements and/or standards established by appropriated Federal, State or local regulatory agencies are to be listed in the Environmental Pollution Control Report. Each installation identifying a new pollution source or environmental protection requirement will report through command channels in accordance with these instructions. Negative report will be rendered by responsible commands in the form of a listing of those installations where remedial measures are not needed to correct a source of pollution or where no additional resources are needed to meet the provisions of this regulation.

§ 650.234   Scope.

(a) The report described herein consists of one exhibit to be prepared at the installation or activity level and two exhibits to be prepared at the major command level. Reports are to be forwarded through channels to HQDA (DAEN-FEU) WASH, DC 20314, by November 15, and May 15, of each year. The exhibits will reflect information as of October 20, and April 20.

(b) Exhibit 1 is entitled—Proposed Project Report. Separate Exhibits will be prepared for each project or activity on an installation in each of the following categories:

(1) Air pollution.

(2) Water pollution.

(3) Solid waste pollution.

(4) Radiation pollution.

(5) Noise pollution.

(6) Pesticide and hazardous/toxic materials pollution.

(7) Environmental management.

(c) Exhibit 2 is entitled—Status Report. It indicates the amount programed, appropriated, or funded; the current working estimate (CWE); and the status of each active project. Separate exhibits will be completed by the major commands for each category or projects (i.e., air, water, noise, solid waste, etc.). After the initial report, marked-up copies of the ADP printout giving an update on all previously reported projects is all that is necessary. The ADP printout to be used for this purpose will be provided by HQDA (DAEN-FEU) WASH, DC 20314.

(d) Exhibit 3 is entitled—Narrative report. Major commands will provide a short explanation of the objectives that will be achieved, the elements of their environmental program that will be given particular emphasis over the short term, and the extent that statutory pollution control requirements and DA environmental goals and objectives will be satisfied by executing the projects or actions listed in the report. For any specific portion of the program that requires more than 12 months to complete, an identification of the major milestones for accomplishing the various actions are also to be included.

§ 650.235   Responsibilities.

(a) Department of the Army Staff. (1) The Chief of Engineers will compile the overall DA report based on submissions from major commands and the National Guard Bureau.

(2) The Chief, Army Reserve will monitor those reports by the major commands to ensure that Reserve installations for which they provide logistic support are included in the Pollution Control Report.

(3) The Chief, National Guard Bureau will submit a report to the Chief of Engineers including those projects for National Guard sites or installations which are supported by federally appropriated funds.

(b) Major commands. (1) Major commands controlling installations or activities, or providing logistical support to Reserve installations in the United States, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Canal Zone, Guam, American Samoa, Virgin Islands and the Trust Territories will submit reports in accordance with this regulation.

(2) Major commands controlling installations or activities in overseas areas will submit reports identifying pollution abatement projects required for compliance with host nation regulations, international or Status of Forces Agreements.

(3) Commanding General, US Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command will submit reports on retrofit projects and programs to bring mobile sources (vehicles, aircraft and watercraft) into compliance with air, water and noise standards.

Instructions for the Preparation and Submission of Exhibits

§ 650.236   Exhibit 1—Proposed Project.

(a) An Exhibit 1 will be prepared and maintained current for all known pollution control projects using the format in Figure 10–1 and for valid environmental protection resource requirements using the format in Figure 10–2. Exhibit 1's previously submitted on air and water pollution control projects which are still valid, but not yet completed, do not have to be resubmitted in the new format except when a significant change takes place to make the earlier Exhibit 1 obsolete. Exhibit 1's are not required for completed projects.

(b) Exhibit 1's for new or revised projects or requirements will be submitted semi-annually by November 15, and May 15, of each year to DAEN-FEU based on the latest information as of 30 days prior to the above reporting dates.

(c) Each project will be identified as to the category of pollution control needed (i.e., air, water, solid waste, radiation, noise, pesticides, and environmental management). Projects within a category will be assigned consecutive numbers by DAEN-FEU beginning with “1.” Project numbers are for permanent identification and may not be reassigned to new projects. Existing air and water pollution control projects previously numbered under RCS DD-I&L(SA) 1383 are to be continued under their originally assigned numbers. These project numbers apply strictly to this report and are not to be confused with or to replace programing line-item numbers.

(d) Each project at the same installation required for a distinct and separate purpose is to be considered a separate project. Separate projects will be reported individually using the project number assigned by DAEN-FEU.

(e) Every item in Figures 10–1 or 10–2 is to be completed for each project. Where no entry is appropriate, enter NA (Not applicable). A specific effort must be made by the installation to obtain any information not immediately on hand.

(f) The following will be reported as other relevant information:

(1) Item 10 of Exhibit 1 will include information not shown elsewhere on the exhibit which is necessary for the evaluation of the project. For example, where the command knows of changing circumstances which will affect the practicability of undertaking a project at a particular facility (e.g., replacement of a facility or a change in installation mission which would alter control needs), these changes are to be stated. If a project is discontinued, state in this item the reasons and circumstances, if any, which might lead to a re-activation of the projects (e.g., plant is put in layaway; re-activation would be based on further troop strength increase or mobilization requirements).

(2) For facilities leased by the Army which are subject to the provisions of this regulation, describe under Item 10 the lease arrangements that would affect the requirements for control measures for such facilities. Such projects will be included in Exhibit 2 with a reference in the margin to the explanation given on Exhibit 1.

(3) If a project proposed in one environmental category is likely to generate pollution of other types, Item 10 is to include a brief description and how it is to be controlled.

(4) Citations or other forms of litigation by regulatory agencies or other official entities will be reported under Item 10.

(g) Enter in Item 11, Figure 10–1 or Item 5, Figure 10–2 known or estimated funding requirements by appropriation account (OMA, MCA, etc.). (This source of project and cost data can be helpful to major commands in the development of annual budget requests to support their environmental program.)

(1) Air—(i) Item 2. Identify the pollutant(s) by name for which the project will be required (for example: Particulate matter, sulfur oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, etc).

(ii) Item 3. State the amount of pollutants emitted by each point of emission being controlled within the facility. These amounts should be measured amounts if available and expressed in the same terms of the applicable emission standard, normally State standards (e.g., lb/hr, ppm, etc.) in Item 8 at maximum process operating rate.

(iii) Item 4. Identify the specific emission point(s) which the project will control. This identification should be specific (e.g., two coal-fired boilers in building “xyz” rather than just “boiler”).

(iv) Item 5. Specify the existing pollution control measures at the individual emission points. If no control measures are being utilized, so state.

(v) Item 6. Indicate the percentage of the pollutant which the control device removes.

(vi) Item 7. Indicate the type control device or process modification to be utilized to control emissions.

(vii) Item 8. Cite the applicable Federal, State or local air pollution emission control standard which the facility is required to meet, referencing the specific code, chapter, and part. Also, include the date the statutory requirements became effective.

(viii) Item 9. Indicate the project schedules proposed by the installation and that required by the statutory standards listed in Item 8. If the schedule for achieving compliance differs from statutory, regulatory, or other milestones and deadlines, indicate the dates the facility will meet them and explain why the statutory or regulatory dates will not be met. If a compliance schedule has been negotiated and accepted by the Regional EPA administrator, list those dates in lieu of those cited in a statute or regulation and indicate the date the compliance schedule was accepted.

(ix) Items 10 & 11. Complete according to instructions §650.236 (a) through (f).

(2) Water—(i) Item 2. Describes specific pollution and nature of problem, e.g., unintercepted washrack wastes containing oil and grease; overloaded sewage treatment plant bypasses raw or partly treated sewage to river; combined sewage overflow carries untreated sewage to lake, etc. Use this item and items 3, 6, and 7 as appropriate to describe infiltration inflow problems and measures required by NPDES permit and/or by “Spill Control and Countermeasure Plans” formulated pursuant to 40 CFR part 112, “Oil Pollution Prevention,” and promulgated in chapter 9 of this regulation.

(ii) Item 3. Show amount of waste generated and treated. Indicate gpd, tgd, or mgd.

(iii) Item 4. Show whether discharge is due to water (name of receiving water and location thereon), sewer system (name), land application, subsurface (e.g., septic system, drainfield, etc.).

(iv) Item 5. If problem as described in items 2 and 4 does not relate to an existing or proposed treatment plant, identify in this item the plant, if any, which ultimately receives, or will receive, and treats the wastewater.

(v) Items 6 and 7. In appropriate item, show existing and proposed ppm and/or lbs. in influent and effluent and percent removal for all principal polluting constituents. As a minimum Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) (Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), and total organic carbon (TOC) where applicable) and suspended solids data should be shown wherever possible.

(vi) Item 8. Cite the applicable Federal, State or local discharge standard which the facility is required to meet, referencing the specific code, chapter and part. Also include date statutory requirement became effective. Briefly summarize the discharge limitations if a NPDES permit has not been issued. When a draft or final NPDES permit has been issued, indicate:

(A) When a permit application was submitted;

(B) The application and/or permit number, and the effective and expiration dates of any permit(s) issued; and

(C) The conditions of each permit in summary form, other than the compliance dates which are to be entered in item 9.

(vii) Item 9. Indicate the project schedules proposed by the command and as required by the standards listed in item 8. Where issued, NPDES permit schedules should be entered in the Regulation Schedule column. If the command schedule for achieving compliance differs from the regulatory, or NPDES scheduled dates indicate the date the facility will be in compliance and explain why the required dates will not be met.

(viii) Item 10. Under lease construction arrangements, state who is responsible for obtaining NPDES permits or for meeting schedules and requirements.

(ix) Item 11. Provide funding requirements.

(3) Solid waste—(i) Item 2. Indicate the activity which is not in compliance with solid waste disposal standards; i.e., waste collection, segregation of wastes, siting or operation of sanitary landfill.

Note: Particular attention is to be given to controlling leachate from landfill seeping into ground or surface water sources, control of surface runoff, sanitation of waste collection and transfer systems.

(ii) Item 3. If specific amounts of pollution are known, list or otherwise provide best estimate.

(iii) Item 4. Give details of the problem; i.e., whatever it is that is not in compliance with standards.

(iv) Item 5. Indicate, as applicable, quantities, types, and sources of solid waste handled; frequency of operation; year of original construction/operation; design life; and estimated remaining life.

(v) Item 6. Discuss effectiveness of existing solid waste management system or practices, if applicable.

(vi) Item 7. Give brief description of proposed project which will bring operation into compliance.

(vii) Item 8. Specify the DA, EPA, or other solid waste management guideline applicable and the specific requirement that makes the project necessary and the effective date of the regulation.

(viii) Items 9, 10 and 11. Complete according to instructions §650.236 (a) through (f)).

(4) Radiation—(i) Item 2. Identify specific type of pollutant; i.e., plutonium, cobalt 60 and other substances emitting ionizing radiations.

(ii) Item 3. Indicate levels of contamination (Curies or subunits, etc.)

(iii) Item 4. Give details of the problem.

(iv) Item 5. Explain current protection measures being employed, if any.

(v) Item 6. Discuss effectiveness of current control measures.

(vi) Item 7. Give brief description of proposed remedial measures.

(vii) Item 8. Specify NRC, EPA, or DA standards that are applicable and effective date of the regulation.

(viii) Items 9, 10 and 11. Complete according to instructions §650.236 (a) through (f)).

(5) Noise Pollution—(i) Item 2. Specify the character of the noise if known or by answering the following questions:

(A) Is the noise impulsive or nonimpulsive?

(B) Is the noise on continuously or is it on-and-off intermittently?

(C) When the noise is on, is it steady in level, or does the level of loudness fluctuate?

(D) Is there a discernable tone or whine in the noise?

(ii) Item 3. Specify: (A) The sound level, if measured, and the measurement methodology utilized;

(B) The elevation of the noise source, and the distance from the source to the noise impacted area;

(C) Identify the facilities or areas affected including the nature of the activities affected by the noise intrusions; e.g., churches, schools, hospitals, homes, recreational areas, offices and business areas, etc., and

(D) Whether areas affected are on or off-post. Technical assistance on identification and characterization of noises should be requested from Commander, US Army Health Services Command (HSC-PA), Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234.

(iii) Item 4. Identify the specific course of noise pollution which requires control. Report as a minimum, those sources which have been the subject of citizen complaints.

(iv) Item 5. (A) Give description of existing level of noise control provided in terms of noise control management techniques such as engineering noise reduction, land use planning, or administrative procedures on controlling the source, path or receptor.

(B) State if sources of acoustic expertise were provided by an accoustical laboratory within the Army, or from commercial acoustical consultants to obtain noise level data.

(v) Item 6. Describe the effectiveness of existing treatment and control measures.

(vi) Item 7. Describe any remedial measures proposed and estimated effect in correcting the noise problem.

(vii) Item 8. Specify those portions and effective dates of applicable Federal, State or local noise regulations, statutes, standards to which the project responds, and the acceptable sound level permitted thereafter. If no regulations are known to apply, indicate if the nature of citizen complaints would justify some form of corrective action.

(viii) Item 9. Indicate the project schedules proposed to comply with standards listed in Item 8. If the schedule for achieving compliance differs from statutory or, regulatory laws, indicate the dates the requirements will be met and explain the reasons therefor.

(ix) Item 10. (A) Identify the complaints received on the noise source in terms of the nature and number of complaints, source of complaints (military or civilian) and how they were registered with the installation (e.g., petitions, phone calls, letters, telegrams, etc.).

(B) Indicate if any legal actions are anticipated or have been initiated against the installation as a result of this reported source of environmental noise pollution.

(x) Item 11. Provide funding requirements.

(6) Pesticides and hazardous/toxic materials. (i) Projects to be reported should involve the control and abatement of pesticide and hazardous/toxic material pollution. Do not describe proposed and/or current programs involving the use of pesticides. Examples of pollution control projects would be measures to correct inadequate storage or disposal facilities to clean up land areas contaminated as a result of a pesticide spill, to provide mixing sinks and bathing facilities for personnel to repackage leaking chemical stock's, etc.

(ii) Item 2. Identify the pesticide or chemical that is the source of pollution and indicate the reason for correcting existing conditions.

(iii) Items 3 thru 6. Complete according to instructions (§650.236(a) through (f)).

(iv) Item 7. Describe the proposed method of disposal or nature of proposed corrective action.

(v) Items 8 thru 11. Complete according to instructions (§650.236(a) through (f)).

(7) Environmental Management. (i) Exhibit 1–EM (figure 10–2) will be used to identify needed resources not included in an Exhibit 1 prepared in accordance with a previous paragraph but are required to comply with the provisions of this regulation. Items to be reported are those needed for the management of an installation environmental program and can logically include:

(A) NEPA resources—Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements.

(B) Manpower resources—Full time environmental coordinators, staff officers, instructors, etc.

(C) Training—Schooling for operators (i.e., sewage treatment plant operators, lab technicians, pesticide applicators); training for management personnel (i.e., environmental co-ordinator, sanitary engineers, etc.).

(D) Environmental surveys—Ecological or archelogical surveys of an installation to obtain information needed for an Environmental Impact Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS or EIS).

(E) Special studies—Technical or engineering studies to define sources of pollution and identify possible remedial measures.

(F) Other—Specify.

(ii) Item 2. Identify the basic requirement using the identifications in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) (A) through (F) of this section.

(iii) Item 3. Explain the requirement and provide a brief justification for any new or additional resources needed for the management of the installation environmental program.

(iv) Item 4. List only those items which are quantifiable, such as number of personnel required, special equipment items, school courses, man-year requirements for studies, etc. by fiscal year.

(v) Item 5. Cite one-time costs or 5- year projected costs by appropriation as applicable.

(vi) Item 6. List other relevant information and specify. (See figure 10–9 and §650.236(f).)

(h) Sample Exhibits—Examples of Exhibit 1's for each of the media are shown in figures 10–3 through 10–9.

§ 650.237   Exhibit 2—Status Report.

(a) Exhibit 2 is a command report which provides a financial summary of the projects in the program and their status. A separate Exhibit 2 is required for each media or category of projects (i.e., air, water, noise, solid waste, etc.) and will be submitted semi-annually along with Exhibit 1's on November 15, and May 15 of each year.

(b) Exhibit 2 will include all active projects plus those completed or discontinued subsequent to the submission of the previous report. Once a project is reported as completed or discontinued, it will be dropped from the report. The May 15 report will contain all projects which the command will submit in the next fiscal year budget. In addition, the November 15 report will reflect congressional appropriation action taken on the prior fiscal year budget.

(c) The initial Exhibit 2's for each media will be prepared by the reporting command using the format in Figure 10–10. Subsequent reports will be only an update of the previous command report. As each Exhibit 2 is received from a command, it will be converted to an ADP printout and returned to the reporting command by DAEN-FEU in 45–60 days for use in the next report update. The following updating procedures will be observed:

(1) One copy of a marked-up printout of the previous Exhibit 2 will accompany the semi-annual report.

(2) Corrections, changes and additions will be made neatly with a RED marking pen.

(3) An asterisk in the left margin will be used to identify projects which have been completed, discontinued or changed.

(4) New projects will be added to the bottom of the appropriate media printout.

(5) Exhibit 2's submitted on May 15 will contain the amount included or proposed to be included in the President's budget for each project, or the amount actually appropriated or funded.

(6) Major Command updating will be done only for non-MCA funded projects. MCA funded project status will be updated by DAEN-FEU.

(7) Each revision of Exhibit 2 will reflect the information as of October 20 and April 20, as appropriate.

(8) Funding totals by appropriation type for each fiscal year and for each media reported will be provided at the bottom of the last page.

(9) Current and relevant information will be presented in the “Status” column using the following format:

(i) Indicate “PP—” if the project is in the preliminary planning stage. The blank provided should contain the estimated completion date for construction.

(ii) Indicate “DES—” if the project is under design or has been designed, but is not under construction. The blank provided should contain the estimated completion date for construction and not the completion date of design.

(iii) Indicate “CON—” if the project is under construction. The blank provided should contain the estimated completion date.

(iv) Indicate “CPL—” if the project has been completed. The blank provided should contain the actual completion date.

(v) Indicate “DIS” if the project has been discontinued or dropped. Reasons should be given.

(vi) Indicate “DEF” if the project has been deferred or significantly delayed. Reasons for and what corrective actions taken, if any, should be given.

(vii) Indicate “OTH” if other than the above circumstances apply. An explanation should be given.

§ 650.238   Exhibit 3—Narrative Report.

(a) The narrative report will be a brief summary of the command environmental program. No specific format is prescribed; however, it will contain the following:

(1) Financial displays for the current FYDP period by appropriation account (MCA, PA, OMA, etc.) and by program media (air, water, noise, etc.). The elements of the program presented in the Exhibit 1–EM are to be aggregated by management activity to identify funding requirements for training, preparation of EIA/EIS, environmental surveys and studies, personnel costs, etc.

(2) An explanation of the environmental objectives to be achieved by completing the projects reported or funding those activities contained in Exhibit 1's. For any specific portion of the program that requires more than 12 months to complete, identify the major milestones for accomplishing the actions.

(3) Elements of the command program that will be given particular emphasis over the short term.

(4) Projection of when statutory pollution control requirements, Federal or state, will be satisfied by the various elements of a command.

(5) Summary of potential or pending environmental litigation involving installations within the command.

(6) Explanation of anticipated problem areas requiring DA assistance.

(b) The content of the narrative report is basically a forecast of how the major command intends to accomplish its environmental program during the succeeding 12 months. This requirement should not be confused with the requirement for the annual status report (RCS DD-I&L(A) 1269), specified in §650.9 of subpart A of this part of this regulation, which is an annual summary of environmental protection accomplishments for the specified preceding calendar year.

Exhibit 1

circular no. a–106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency:

Project No:

Media:

Date Prepared:Date Revised:GSA InventoryControl No.:

1. Facility.

Name____________________
Address____________________
(city, county, state)      Agency contact____________________
(name, title, telephone)  

2. Specific Type of Pollution.

3. Amount of Pollution.

4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point.

5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures.

6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control.

7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem.

8. Applicable Standards. (Cite the specific State, interstate, local, or Federal regulation and specific requirement for which the project is needed.)

9. Project Schedule.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------                                              Agency        Regulation                                          schedule_month  schedule_month                                             and year        and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion).....................  ..............  ..............Construction (start)....................  ..............  ..............Construction (completion)...............  ..............  ..............Operation (start).......................  ..............  ..............Final compliance........................  ..............  ..............------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Other Relevant Information.

11. Funding Schedule.

Figure 10–1

Exhibit 1–EM

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Management Requirement

Date Prepared:

Dated Revised:

GSA Inventory Control No.:

1. Facility.

Name:____________________
Address:____________________
(city, county, state)      Agency Contact:____________________
(name, title, telephone)  

2. Resource Identification.

3. Explanation and Justification of Resource Requirement. Identify why resources, personnel and/or funds are needed for the “management” or conduct of the installation environmental program.

4. Proposed Resource Schedule. List by fiscal year for the period of the FYDP, when applicable.

5. Funding. Indicate appropriation account, amounts by fiscal year and whether amount is programed or unprogramed.

6. Other Relevant Information.

Figure 10–2

Exhibit 1

circular no. a–106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army

Media: Air

Project No.: A-078CDated Prepared: 5/26/73Date Revised: 2/11/74GSA Inventory Control No.:

1. Facility.

Name: ABC Army Ammunition Plant.

Address: Kingstown, George County, S.C.

Agency Contact: MJR B. A. Smith Facility Engineer (615) 765–4321.

2. Specific Type of Pollution. NO2

3. Amount of Pollution. 4,500/hr when process is operated at maximum rate.

4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. Nitric Acid Plant No. 13, Bldg. A.

5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. No control measures.

6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. 0% Removal efficiency.

7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Construct packed column control device 94% efficient to achieve full compliance.

8. Applicable Standards. (1) State: State Air Code, Chapter V, S113.a(ii)

(2) Region:

(3) Actual standard or exact citation: Maximum of 450/hr allowed as per the XYZ test method; effective date of emission standard is 1/31/72.

9. Project Schedule.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------                                              Agency        Regulation                                          schedule_month  schedule_month                                             and year        and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion).....................          4-74            4-74Construction (start)....................         10-74            9-74Construction (completion)...............          1-75           11-74Final Operation (start).................          6-75            5-75Final compliance........................          7-75            9-75------------------------------------------------------------------------

Explanation of difference between items 8 and 9: project advanced to provide margin of safety.

10. Other Relevant Information. Citizens complaints received on 12/15/73. Suits initiated on 12/30/73 by Onaconda Environmental Study Group.

11. Funding.

                        [In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------                                              Fiscal years             PEMA              -----------------------------------------                                  1976     1977    1978    1979    1980------------------------------------------------------------------------Programed.....................  \1\ $875       0       0       0       0Unprogramed...................         0       0       0       0       0------------------------------------------------------------------------\1\ Included as part of plant modernization program.

Figure 10–3

Exhibit 1

circular no. a–106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army

Media: Water

Project No.: A-999b.Date Prepared: 2–29–72Date Revised: 12–26–73GSA Inventory Control No.: 45678

1. Facility.

Name: Camp Faraway.

Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.

Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer. (615) 755–0022.

2. Specific Type of Pollution. Domestic sewage, partly treated. Existing treatment plant overloaded. Excess flow bypassed to river. Influent includes small amounts (.01 mgd) of filter backwash from water treatment plant containing precipitates of alum, iron, and manganese.

3. Amount of Pollution. Total flow: 6.2 mgd. Treated: 4.0 mgd.

4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. Secondary treatment plant discharges to Obstacle River, 3 miles below Mulch City water supply intake.

5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. Secondary—high rate trickling filter plant, final sedimentation, and chlorination. Design Capacity=4.0 mgd.

6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------                                             In parts per million                                     -----------------------------------        Principal constituent                       Treated     Percent                                       Influent    effluent     removal------------------------------------------------------------------------BOD5................................      235.00       36.00          83Suspended solids....................      392.00       60.00          85Total phosphorous as P..............        8.98        4.67          48Total nitrogen as N.................       24.96       21.14          15------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Replace existing treatment plant with AWT plant: chemical/activated sludge/multi-media filtration to achieve 95 percent removals or better. Design capacity=7.5 mgd.

8. Applicable Standards. State Standards. SD Code: Water Poll—Chapter 61, 1960 Supp. SD Code: Public Health—Chapter 27, 1960 Supp. Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters: Reg E–1.10A (Rev.).

Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 125, 133, PL 92–500, SS 301, 313, PL 92–500, S 402–NPDES, NPDES Permit Number-SD0012345, Permit Period—1974–1979.

9. Project Schedule.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------                                              Agency        Regulation                                          schedule_month  schedule_month                                             and year        and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion).....................          4-75             N/AConstruction (start)....................          6-75            5-75Construction (completion)...............          2-77            1-77Operation (start).......................          4-77             N/AFinal compliance........................          6-77            7-77------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regulation schedule as required by NPDES permit. State water quality standard requires adequate secondary treatment by 1/74.

Unable to meet State requirement because of design problems and funding cycle. State has permitted delay on condition NPDES permit deadline is met.

10. Other Relevant Information. Installation may become surplus in FY 75 or FY 76 leading to project discontinuance.

Funding.

                        [In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------                                               Fiscal year              MCA              -----------------------------------------                                 1976     1977     1978    1979    1980------------------------------------------------------------------------Programed.....................       0    $8,000       0       0       0Unprogramed...................       0         0       0       0       0------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10–4

Exhibit 1

circular no. a–106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army.

Media: Solid Waste.

Project No.: A-001Date Prepared:2/11/74Date Revised:GSA InventoryControl No.:

1. Facility.

Name: Camp Faraway.

Address: Mulch City, Enny County, SD

Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities

Engineer (615) 755–0022.

2. Specific Type of Pollution. Camp landfill.

3. Amount of Pollution. Leachate of high BOD concentration.

4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. Landfill is used for disposal of installation wastes. Due to frequent rains, wastes build up high moisture content and leachate, which emanates from side of fill. Also, area is noted to be a common breeding ground for flies and mosquitos, and is generally unsightly.

5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. a. Landfill receives 10 tons per day of solid waste altogether, 5 from the Camp and 5 from the nearby Lindberg Air Base. It consists mainly of normal municipal-type wastes delivered on Monday, Wednesday and Friday of each week. Once a week a large load of oily rags is dumped in one corner of the landfill site.

b. Landfill was first opened in Summer of 1970 and is designed to operate until 1990.

c. Some control of run-off waters is exercised by a trench on the downhill side of landfill draining into a settling pond.

6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Trench prevents run-off waters from entering local bay waters, but does not solve vector, or aesthetic problems, nor does it minimize the amount of leachate forming.

7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Purchase of bulldozer to compact and cover wastes, minimize formation of leachate, control vectors, and improve general appearance. Relocate landfill to area with better drainage.

8. Applicable Standards. EPA Guidelines for Land Disposal of Solid Wastes, published in Federal Register July 1, 1974, requirements under §§241.204, 241.207, 241.208, 241.209, and 241.210.

9. Project Schedule.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                    Agency      Agency                                                   schedule    schedule                                                   month and   month and                                                     year        year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion).............................         N/A         N/AConstruction (start)............................         N/A         N/AConstruction (completion).......................         N/A         N/ABegin procurement action........................        7-75         N/AOperation (start)...............................        7-76         N/AFinal compliance................................        7-76         N/A------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Other Relevant Information. Station planning to build an incinerator in 1980 to extend life of landfill.

11. Funding.

                        [In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------                                               Fiscal years                                 ---------------------------------------                                   1976    1977    1978    1979    1980------------------------------------------------------------------------  PEMA:Programed.......................       0       0       0       0       0Unprogramed.....................     $30       0       0       0       0  OMA:Programed engineering study.....      $3       0       0       0       0Unprogramed construction new      ......     $10  ......  ......  ...... landfill.......................------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10–5

Exhibit 1

circular no. a–106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army.

Media: Radiation.

Project No.: A-001Date Prepared:6/14/74Date Revised:6/15/74GSA Inventory Control No.:

1. Facility.

Name: Camp Faraway, Power Reactor.

Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.

Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.

2. Specific Type of Pollution. Tritium in primary water cooling system.

3. Amount of Pollution. Tritium concerntrates exceed new NRC, EPA and DA standards for discharge of primary coolant water.

4. Pollution Source and Discharge, Emission or Deposit Point. Primary coolant water discharged to holding tank and then periodically released to Lake Enny.

5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measure. Holding tank before release to lake.

6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Only limited decay obtained from retention in holding tank.

7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Redesign holding tank system to include addition of ion exchanger.

8. Applicable Standards and Regulations. 10 CFR parts 20 and 50, 40 CFR part 190 and AR 385–80.

9. Project Schedule.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------                                              Agency          Agency                                          schedule_month  schedule_month                                             and year        and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion).....................          2-75             N/AConstruction (start)....................          5-75             N/AConstruction (completion)...............          7-75             N/AOperation (start).......................          8-75             N/AFinal compliance........................          8-75             N/A------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Other Relevant Information. None.

11. Funding.

                        [In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------                                               Fiscal years               MCA               ---------------------------------------                                   1976    1977    1978    1979    1980------------------------------------------------------------------------Program.........................    $375  ......  ......  ......  ......------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10–6

Exhibit 1

circular no. a–106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army

Media: Noise

Project No.: A-001Date Prepared: 6/1/74Date Revised:GSA Inventory Control No.: 45678

1. Facility.

Name: Camp Faraway.

Address: Mulch City, Enny County, SD

Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.

2. Specific Type of Pollution. Noise is broadband with discernible tones. (Noise is nonimpulsive; it is continuous at a steady in level, but with a discernible tone).

3. Amount of Pollution. The source measures 75 dBA at the property line. Source is 20 feet from boundary line at a height of 15 feet. Facilities or areas affected: Civilian school and housing (off the installation).

4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. One power plant with forced draft fans and cooling tower.

5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. No noise control exists. Acoustic expertise-Acoustics, Inc., Chicago, IL.

6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. None.

7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problems. Installation of commercially available mufflers on all forced draft fans and noise enclosure on cooling tower. It is expected that this action will lower the sound level below the background noise.

8. Applicable Standards. Mulch Noise Ordinance, Section 4–12, Chapter 17 of the Municipal Code of Mulch, requires that the noise level at the boundary line in business and commercial districts not exceed 62 dBA.

9. Project Schedule.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------                                              Agency          Agency                                          schedule_month  schedule_month                                             and year        and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion).....................          9-76             N/AConstruction (start)....................         11-74             N/AConstruction (completion)...............          2-77             N/AOperation (start).......................          3-77             N/AFinal compliance........................          4-77             N/A------------------------------------------------------------------------

The standards require immediate compliance. Agency schedule provides for earliest possible installation of control measures.

10. Other Relevant Information. (a) Community complaints have included 26 telephone calls, 15 letters, and 3 personal visits. Nature of complaints centered upon annoyance. (Log of noise complaints attached.)

(b) Legal action has not been initiated but may be by County School Board.

11. Funding.

                        [In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------                                               Fiscal years               OMA               ---------------------------------------                                   1976    1977    1978    1979    1980------------------------------------------------------------------------(a) Mufflers on forced draft fans:  Programed.....................  ......     $25  ......  ......  ......  Unprogramed...................  ......  ......  ......  ......  ......(b) Enclosures on cooling tower:  Programed.....................  ......  ......  ......  ......  ......  Unprogramed...................  ......     $10  ......  ......  ......------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10–7

Exhibit 1

circular no. a–106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army

Media: Pesticides & Hazardous/Toxic Materials

Project No.: A-002Date Prepared:Sept. 15, 1974Date Revised: ____________GSA Inventory Control No.:

1. Facility.

Name: Camp Faraway. Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.

Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.

2. Specific type of pollution. The following pesticides registered for the control of pests: malathion, diazinon, chlorpyrifos, propoxur, lindane, chlordane.

3. Amount of Pollution. Quantities of pesticide concentrate mixed per month: Malathion, 10 gal; diazinon, 10 gal; chlorpyrifos, 7 gal; propoxur, 10 gal; lindane, 2 gal; chlordane, 10 gal.

4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. N/A.

5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. Mixing sink with sump.

6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Sink too small. Inadequate neutralization and sump capacity. Requires manual bailing.

7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Replace small mixing sink with larger double mixing sink. Install a neutralization and holding tank with sump pump for pesticide rinses.

8. Applicable Standards. Executive Order 11643—Environmental Safeguards on Activities for Animal Damage Control on Federal Lands. February 8, 1972. Additionally, the EPA, under statutory authority of Section 4, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended by the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act.

9. Project Schedule.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------                                              Agency          Agency                                          schedule_month  schedule_month                                             and year        and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion).....................         10-75             N/AConstruction (start)....................          1-76             N/AConstruction (completion)...............          3-76             N/AOperation (start).......................          4-76             N/A------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Other Relevant Information. Other stocks of suspended on finally cancelled pesticides will be stored until proper disposal methods are developed. Inventory: 5 percent DDT in oil—350 gallons; 75 percent DDT wettable powder—220 lbs.

11. Funding Schedule.

                        [In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------                                               Fiscal years               OMA               ---------------------------------------                                   1976    1977    1978    1979    1980------------------------------------------------------------------------Programed.......................    $3.0       0       0       0       0Unprogramed.....................       0       0       0       0       0------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10–8

Exhibit 1–EM

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Management Report

Agency: Department of the Army

Media: Management

Date Prepared:1 Oct 74Date Revised:GSA InventoryControl No.:12345

1. Facility.

Name: Fort Stoner.

Address: Podunk, Organ County, SD

Agency Contact: Col J. J. Jones, Facility Engineer, AV 823–1555.

2. Resource Identification. Training.

3. Explanation and Justification of Resource Requirement. Training is required for sewage treatment plant superintendent, operators and laboratory technician to meet certification standards of South Dakota. A new sewage treatment plant will be put into operation in December 1975 and trained personnel will be required to operate it. Current personnel are not familiar with the operation of the new plant and require instructions on State requirements and standards.

4. Proposed Resource Schedule. Training offered at University of South Dakota. Attendance at one-week courses is as follows:

                        [In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------                                               Fiscal years               OMA               ---------------------------------------                                   1975    1976    1977    1978    1979------------------------------------------------------------------------Superintendent..................  ......  ......  ......  ......  ......Operator........................  ......       2       2       1       1Lab technician..................  ......       1  ......  ......  ......------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Funding.

                        [In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------                                               Fiscal years               OMA               ---------------------------------------                                   1975    1976    1977    1978    1979------------------------------------------------------------------------Programed.......................    $0.2    $0.6  ......  ......  ......Unprogramed.....................  ......  ......    $0.4    $0.2    $0.2------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. Other Relevant Information. Outyear requirements reflect training for new hires.

Figure 10–9

                                                    Exhibit 2                                             pollution status report  ------------------------------------------------------------ (media)                 Appropriation account: _________ (OMA, MCA,                  etc.) Agency          Page ___ of ___Agency contact   Reporting Date _________Telephone----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                Project name and     Project costs ($1,000's)_Amount in President's budget or agency plan or amount appropriated or funded                                  location (GSA  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Present cost          Project No.               inventory                                          Current fiscal                                                             estimate           Status                                  control No.)     Fiscal year -2    Fiscal year -1         year         Fiscal year +1    Fiscal year +2    Fiscal year +3------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note: Provide totals on the last page for each appropriation account.

Figure 10–10

Appendix A to Part 650—Procedures for the Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties

FRIDAY, JANUARY 25, 1974

WASHINGTON, DC

Volume 39—Number 18

PART II

See Federal Register 39 FR 3366–3370, January 25, 1974.

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Procedures for the Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties

Browse Previous






















chanrobles.com