Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1907 > August 1907 Decisions > G.R. No. L-3460 August 22, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. LEON NARVASA, ET AL.

008 Phil 410:



[G.R. No. L-3460. August 22, 1907. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEON NARVASA AND MACARIO ESTACIO, Defendants-Appellants.

Mariano Legaspi, for appellant Narvasa.

Gustave Solignac, for appellant Estacio.

Attorney-General Araneta, for Appellee.


ATTEMPTED ABDUCTION; APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 11, PENAL CODE. — It was not the intention of the framers of the Penal Code to apply article 11 of said code to natives of the Philippine Islands who have sufficient intelligence to be selected as policemen, and especially to those who have been recognized as having sufficient intelligence to act as corporal of police.



These defendants were charged with the crime of attempted abduction, committed as

"That the said accused, on the night of the day of the 9th of October, 1905, in the barrio of Sagudnabaley of the pueblo of San Fabian, Province of Pangasinan, attempted to abduct Juana Baltazar, against her will y con miras deshonestas, Leon Narvasa taking hold of her hand for the purpose of taking her away, which he was unable to do by reason of the resistance with the same Juana Baltazar made, and for the reason that Victoriano Baltazar then and there arrived upon the scene, acts which constitute the crime of attempted abduction, defined and punished in article 445, in its relation with paragraph 3 [of article 3] of the Penal Code, against the provisions of the law."cralaw virtua1aw library

To this complaint the attorney for the defendants filed a demurrer, alleging that the stated in the complaint did not constitute a crime under the laws of the Philippine Islands. The record does not disclose that the question raised in the demurrer was ever decided by the lower court.

After hearing the evidence adduced during the trial, the lower court, found that the defendants were guilty of the crime charged in the complaint, and taking into consideration the aggravating circumstance of nocturnity, without any extenuating circumstances, giving the defendants the benefit of article 11 of the Penal Code, sentenced the said defendants each to be imprisoned for a term of two years four months and one day and to pay the costs, Macario Estacio having been a prisoner in the provincial jail of the Province of Pangasinan for some time, the lower court ordered that he be allowed one-half of such imprisonment. From this sentence the defendants appealed to this court.

The lower court in its decision made the following finding of

"There is no reasonable doubt in the court’s mind that the two defendants went to the house on the night in question for the purpose and with the unchaste design, as alleged in said complaint, of abducting the said Juana Baltazar, and the facts as disclosed by the evidence show that there could not have been any other design or purpose on their part being there except the incredible ’fish story’ which they set up as the reason why they were there."cralaw virtua1aw library

The testimony of Juana Baltazar shows the following facts:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

That she was a widow, 17 years of age, and lived with her father in the pueblo of San Fabian in the Province of Pangasinan; that on the night of the 9th of October, 1905, the defendants came to the house where she was living; that Leon Narvasa took hold of her and told her to get her bundle and to come away with him to another house; that she objected; that Macario Estacio during this time was standing in the door of the house; that she carried out; that her brother Victoriano heard her cry and immediately called to her mother and inquired what was the trouble; that thereupon when the defendants heard the voice of her brother downstairs they immediately escaped; that she had not known the defendants prior to that time; that there were with her in the house at the time the defendants entered, her brother Jose, her mother, who was in another part of the house, and her sister-in-law; that her brother Jose, who was about 13 years old, and her sister-in-law were in that part of the house with her when the defendants entered.

This testimony of Juana Baltazar was substantially corroborated by the testimony of her brother Jose and by Jacinta Almonte, her sister-in-law, who was about 16 years of age.

The fact that the defendants had been in the house of Juana Baltazar is also verified by the testimony of her father and brother, Bartolome and Victoriano Baltazar, who returned to their home while the defendants were in the house and saw them escaping.

Leon Narvasa testified on his own behalf and admitted that he had been in the house of Juana at the time mentioned in the complaint, but that he was there for the purpose of buying dried fish; that he did not enter the house of Juana but remained at the foot of the stairs and that Macario Estacio alone went into the house for the purpose of buying the fish. The evidence shows that Leon Narvasa was a corporal of police in the said pueblo of San Fabian.

The lower court gave the defendants the benefit of the provisions of article 11 of the Penal Code. We do not believe that it was the intention to have article 11 apply to Filipinos sufficiently intelligent to be selected as policemen, and especially those who have been recognized as having sufficient intelligence to act as a corporal of police. The evidence discloses no good reason why this article should be applied to the defendant Macario Estacio.

We find from the evidence, therefore, that the defendants are guilty of the crime of attempted abduction, executed in the manner and form as described in said complaint; that there existed the aggravating circumstances of nocturnity and morada, without any extenuating circumstances. The defendants then must be punished in the maximum degree of prision correccional, under article 445 of the Penal Code, in its relation with article 66 of said code.

Therefore it is the judgment of this court that the sentence of the lower court be modified and that the defendants be imprisoned for a period of four years two months and one day of prision correccional, and to suffer the accessory penalties provided for in article 61 of the Penal Code, and each to pay one-half the costs.

The record discloses the fact that Macario Estacio has been detained, as a prisoner during the pendency of this action; therefore, in accordance with the provisions of article 93 of the provisional law one-half of such imprisonment shall be deducted from the above period of imprisonment. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Willard, and Tracey, JJ., concur.

Back to Home | Back to Main

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review :

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line :

August-1907 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-3640 August 1, 1907 - CHARLES S. ROBINSON v. CHARLES F. GARRY

    008 Phil 275

  • G.R. No. L-4011 August 1, 1907 - MAMERTA BANAL v. JOSE SAFONT, ET AL.

    008 Phil 276

  • G.R. No. L-3574 August 2, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. NICOMEDES DE DIOS

    008 Phil 279

  • G.R. No. L-3965 August 2, 1907 - ENRIQUE F. SOMES, ET AL. v. A.S. CROSSFIELD, ET AL.

    008 Phil 283

  • G.R. No. L-3422 August 3, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. MANUEL SAMONTE

    008 Phil 286

  • G.R. No. L-3576 August 3, 1907 - FLORENCIO TERNATE v. MARIA ANIVERSARIO

    008 Phil 292

  • G.R. No. L-3841 August 3, 1907 - CHUNG KIAT v. LIM KIO, ET AL.

    008 Phil 297

  • G.R. No. L-2730 August 7, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. BASILIO MORALES, ET AL.

    008 Phil 300

  • G.R. No. L-2837 August 7, 1907 - CALDER & CO. v. UNITED STATES

    008 Phil 303

  • G.R. No. L-2838 August 7, 1907 - MACONDRAY & CO. v. UNITED STATES

    008 Phil 305

  • G.R. No. L-3419 August 7, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. DOMINGO POLINTAN

    008 Phil 309

  • G.R. No. L-3517 August 7, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE MAGNO, ET AL.

    008 Phil 314

  • G.R. No. L-3586 August 7, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. HIGINO VELASQUEZ

    008 Phil 321

  • G.R. No. L-3608 August 7, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. ESTANISLAO FLOIRENDO

    008 Phil 325

  • G.R. No. L-3842 August 7, 1907 - VICTORINO RON, ET AL. v. FELIX MOJICA

    008 Phil 328


    008 Phil 332

  • G.R. No. L-2836 August 8, 1907 - CALDER & CO. v. UNITED STATES

    008 Phil 334

  • G.R. No. L-2840 August 8, 1907 - KUENZLE & STREIFF v. UNITED STATES

    008 Phil 339

  • G.R. No. L-4002 August 8, 1907 - LO PO v. H.B. McCOY

    008 Phil 343

  • G.R. No. L-3507 August 9, 1907 - ISABELO AGUIRRE v. OCCIDENTAL NEGROS, ET AL.

    008 Phil 350

  • G.R. No. L-2841 August 10, 1907 - RUBERT & GUAMIS v. UNITED STATES

    008 Phil 352

  • G.R. No. L-3488 August 10, 1907 - C.S. ROBINSON, ET AL. v. THE SHIP "ALTA", ET AL.

    008 Phil 355

  • G.R. No. L-3456 August 14, 1907 - JOSEPH N. WOLFSON v. ELIAS REYES, ET AL.

    008 Phil 364

  • G.R. No. L-3529 August 14, 1907 - ESTEBAN GUILLERMO v. RAMON MATIENZO, ET AL.

    008 Phil 368

  • G.R. No. L-2839 August 15, 1907 - CALDER & CO. v. UNITED STATES

    008 Phil 373

  • G.R. No. L-3562 August 15, 1907 - GUTIERREZ HERMANOS v. ANTONIO VALLEJO

    008 Phil 377

  • G.R. No. L-3363 August 17, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. JOAQUIN CELIS

    008 Phil 378

  • G.R. No. L-3554 August 17, 1907 - JULIANA BENEMERITO v. FERNANDO VELASCO

    008 Phil 381

  • G.R. No. L-3572 August 17, 1907 - S.G. LARSON v. H. BRODEK

    008 Phil 383

  • G.R. No. L-3627 August 17, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. JOAQUIN CELIS

    008 Phil 385

  • G.R. No. L-3664 August 17, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. LEONA CINCO, ET AL.

    008 Phil 388

  • G.R. No. L-3200 August 19, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS COLOMBRO

    008 Phil 391

  • G.R. No. L-3625 August 19, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. JOAQUIN CELIS

    008 Phil 394

  • G.R. No. L-3432 August 20, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. ESTANISLAO GASINGAN

    008 Phil 397


    008 Phil 399

  • G.R. No. L-3626 August 21, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. JOAQUIN CELIS

    008 Phil 408

  • G.R. No. L-3460 August 22, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. LEON NARVASA, ET AL.

    008 Phil 410

  • G.R. No. L-3557 August 22, 1907 - VICTORIANO GARCIA, ET AL. v. REMIGIO DIAMSON

    008 Phil 414

  • G.R. No. L-3173 August 23, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. MODESTO GARCIA

    008 Phil 416

  • G.R. No. L-3568 August 23, 1907 - ROMAN ESPAÑA v. LEONARDO LUCIDO

    008 Phil 419

  • G.R. No. L-3510 August 24, 1907 - HENRY O’CONNELL v. NARCISO MAYUGA

    008 Phil 422

  • G.R. No. L-3573 August 24, 1907 - HENRY BRODEK v. S.G. LARSON

    008 Phil 425


    008 Phil 427

  • G.R. No. L-3622 August 26, 1907 - H.W. PEABODY & CO., ET AL. v. PACIFIC EXPORT & LUMBER CO.

    008 Phil 429

  • G.R. No. L-3734 August 26, 1907 - JAMES J. PETERSON v. RAFAEL AZADA

    008 Phil 432


    008 Phil 438

  • G.R. No. L-3192 August 29, 1907 - LUISA ALVAREZ v. SHERIFF OF ILOILO, ET AL.

    008 Phil 441

  • G.R. No. L-3458 August 29, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. FIDEL GONZALEZ

    008 Phil 442

  • G.R. No. L-3526 August 29, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. SEVERINO MACAVINTA

    008 Phil 447

  • G.R. No. L-3636 August 29, 1907 - FREDERICK GARFIELD WAITE v. JAMES J. PETERSON, ET AL.

    008 Phil 449

  • G.R. No. L-3547 August 30, 1907 - LORENZA PAEZ v. JOSE BERENGUER

    008 Phil 454

  • G.R. No. L-3628 August 30, 1907 - MANUEL COUTO SORIANO v. BLAS CORTES

    008 Phil 459

  • G.R. No. L-3416 August 31, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. PILAR JAVIER, ET AL.

    008 Phil 462

  • G.R. No. L-3561 August 31, 1907 - RITA GARCIA, ET AL. v. SIMEON BALANAO, ET AL.

    008 Phil 465

  • G.R. No. L-3630 August 31, 1907 - JOS. N. WOLFSON v. CAYETANO CHINCHILLA

    008 Phil 467

  • G.R. No. L-3637 August 31, 1907 - PEDRO P. ROXAS, ET AL. v. ANASTASIO CUEVAS, ET AL.

    008 Phil 469