Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1995 > July 1995 Decisions > Adm. Matter No. P-94-1075 July 14, 1995 - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. LOLITA A. GRECIA:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[Adm. Matter No. P-94-1075. July 14, 1995.]

OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, v. LOLITA A. GRECIA, Utility Worker, I, MTCC, General Santos City, Respondent.


SYLLABUS


JUDICIARY; COURT EMPLOYEES; GROSS NEGLECT OF DUTY; PENALTY OF DISMISSAL, JUSTIFIED IN CASE AT BAR. — Regardless of status in life and rank in the service, the Court always deals with the members of the judiciary with an even hand and equal concern, for of such, after all, is the essence of adjudicatory justice. The antecedents of this punitive proceeding are documented an undisputed. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the records of this administrative matter, including the original rollo thereof when it was still docketed as Administrative Matter No. 94-7-52-MTCC, before the Court directed the Office of the Court Administrator to file a formal charge against respondent in its resolution of August 18, 1994. As earlier stated, the foregoing findings of complainant reflect a correct and complete chronological narrative of respondent’s regrettable actuations. In the same report of the Office of the Court Administrator, dated April 20, 1995, this discussion of the unfortunate situation obtaining in Branch I, Municipal Trial Court in Cities, General Santos City, follows from the aforestated factual findings: Section 22, paragraph (q), Rule XIV, Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V (Civil Service Law), EO 292 provides, among others, that frequent unauthorized absence or tardiness in reporting for duty, loafing or frequent unauthorized absences during regular office hours carries a penalty of suspension of six (6) months and one (1) day to one (1) year for the first offense, and dismissal for the second offense. Mrs. Grecia has admitted her unauthorized absences. She even stated that she decided to absent herself for the months of June, July and August 1993 WITHOUT PERMISSION from her superiors because of marital problems. Her unauthorized absences started (in) May of 1983 when she was still Ms. Alfafara. Now that she is Mrs. Grecia, she is incurring more unauthorized absences primarily because of marital troubles. While this Office would like to sympathize with respondent due to the fact that she is having problems with her marriage, the fact is that she is prejudicing public service with her frequent unauthorized absences. The public image of a well-functioning courtroom has been entirely demolished for as Judge Majaducon stated in his Memorandum to respondent dated October 2, 1992: "We have the dirtiest courtroom." This is not a mere case of frequent unauthorized absences within a localized period of time, e.g., a one (1) year period. This is a case of CONTINUOUS VIOLATION — Frequent Unauthorized Absences — of the Civil Service Law if we take into account that her absences span a period of at the very least ten (10) years, i.e., May of 1983 to June of 1993. It should be noted that Section 23, paragraph (b) of the abovementioned rules provides that a civil service employee found guilty of Gross Neglect of Duty is meted the penalty of Dismissal for the FIRST offense. Everytime respondent absents herself without permission from her superiors, she also neglects her duty of cleaning the court room and court offices, This has been going on repeatedly for also ten (10) years. By her own admission, respondent Grecia, as a public officer and public servant, "has been remiss in the performance of the duties of her office which demands utmost dedication and efficiency." We find these observations to be correct, just as we find the recommendation for respondent’s dismissal from the service to be justified. Indeed, even with the fullest measure of sympathy and patience, we cannot act otherwise since the exigencies of government service cannot and should never be subordinated to purely human equations.


D E C I S I O N


PER CURIAM:


This administrative matter has detained the Court so long and has imposed upon its time so much that the same must now be brought to its logical termination. On the one hand, however, the attention given by this Court to this case vividly illustrates how, regardless of status in life and rank in the service, the Court always deals with the members of the judiciary with an even hand and equal concern, for of such, after all, is the essence of adjudicatory justice.

The antecedents of this punitive proceeding are documented and undisputed to the point that the report of complainant Office of the Court Administrator on those aspects need merely he reproduced:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Pursuant to the Resolution of the Court En Banc dated August 18, 1994, the Office of the Court Administrator filed Administrative Complaint against Mrs. Lolita Alfafara Grecia, Utility Worker I, MTCC, Branch 1, General Santos City, charging her with Neglect of Duty and Habitual Unauthorized Absences committed as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. On May 25, 1983, Mr. Eligio G. Ganer, Branch Clerk of Court, MTCC, Branch 1, General Santos City, issued a Memorandum to Ms. Lolita Alfafara, Staff Aide, same court, directing her not to (a) neglect her cleaning duties such as removing the cobwebs and dust on the ceiling of the court room aside from cleaning the court room and (b) incur more unauthorized absences, which for May, 1983 alone reached up to four (4) unauthorized absences;

2. On August 1, 1983, Mr. Ganer recommended to A Atty. Benito M. Claudio, Clerk of Court, MTCC, General Santos City, that Ms. Alfafara be suspended without pay for fifteen (15) days for incurring a total of seventeen (17) unauthorized absences from May to July, 1983;

3. On September 26, 1983, Atty. Benito Claudio formally brought to the attention of Judge Romerico P. Vencer, Executive Judge, MTCC, General Santos City, the continuous absences without leave of Ms. Alfafara. She was reported to have also absented herself from September 19 to 24 and 26, 1983;

4. On August 1, 1989, Judge Jose S. Majaducon, MTCC, Branch 1, General Santos City, issued to former Ms. Alfafara, now Mrs. Grecia, a memorandum warning her of her numerous unjustified absences;

5. On October 2, 1992, Judge Majaducon again issued Mrs. Grecia a memorandum this time requiring her to explain within 72 hours from its receipt why no disciplinary action should be taken against her for (a) reporting late and going home early for 16 days of September, 1992; (b) for incurring 3 1/2 days unauthorized absences for September, 1992; (c) failure to clean the court room and offices; and (d) leaving work without permission and found gallivanting and gossiping in other offices;

6. On June 17, 1993, Judge Majaducon, together with Mr. Ganer and Ms. Veronica A. Canonigo, Clerk of Court III, same court, recommended to the Court Administrator that Mrs. Grecia be dismissed from the service on the ground of inefficiency -- she had always been absenting herself from work that other court personnel had to do her work. Attached to their letter was a summary of her unauthorized absences which is as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

January 1993 --- 2 days

February 1993 --- 6 days

March 1993 --- 5 days

April 1993 --- 4 days

May 1993 --- 3 days

June 1-17 1993 --- 10 l/2 days

7. On October 8, 1993, Arty Baumaun, Deputy Clerk of Court and Chief Administrative officer, this Court, wrote Mrs. Grecia requiring her to explain within five (5) days from receipt why she should not be dropped from the rolls for being continuously absent from June 1, 1993;

8. On November 16, 1993, Judge Majaducon informed Mrs. Rowena Castro-Benipayo that Atty. Baumann’s letter was served on Mrs. Grecia’s husband who, in the accompanying Certificate of Service, stated that "the whereabouts of his wife is not also known to him;"

9. On February 11, 1994,- Judge Majaducon recommended that Mrs. Grecia be dismissed from the service in reply to Arty. Baumann’s letter dated January 25, 1994 asking for his recommendation re Mrs. Grecia.

Eventually, respondent surfaced to file an answer, dated November 11, 1994, with the following explanations:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. She was absent the four (4) days in May, 1983 because "masama ang aking pakiramdam noon;"

2. Her seventeen (17) days unauthorized absences in July of 1983 are due to the fact that "nagkataon po kasi na masama ang aking katawan, kaya napabayaan ko ang trabajo;"

3. She was absent during September of 1983 because "naglilihi ako at parati akong nahihilo;"

4. Regarding the August 1, 1989 memorandum of Judge Majaducon warning her of her numerous absences, "talaga lang po sir wala talaga akong ‘peace of mind,’ nagkakaproblema lang po ako sa sitwasyon ko, dahil walang trabajo ang Mr. ko at lalo na ang anak ko masakitin;"

5. Regarding the October 2, 1992 memorandum of Judge Majaducon requiring her to explain why no disciplinary action should betaken against her for her unauthorized absences:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Kasi po sir nagkataon na ang aking anak nagkakasakit kaya nale-late ako sa pagpasok, wala akong maiwanan sa anak ko kaya nagaabala po ako sa kanya kaya maaga akong umuuwi, kaya po sir, medyo mataas ang absences ko. Kaya po sir napabayaan ko maglinis, parang wala na ako sa sarili ko. Kahit saan nalan(g) ako naghiram ng pera. Minsan nakauwi ako w/o permission, parang hindi ko alam ang aking ginawa sir, sa sobrang problema;"

6. With regard to her absences from January to June 17, 1993:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

a) January, 1993 — "Po sir nag absent ako noon kay may inaasikaso akong importante parte sa marriage Contract ng mother ko;"

b) February, 1993 — "Po sir nag absent ako noon kay high fever ako, hindi ako nagpahospital kay takot ako ng injection, kaya sa bahay na lang ako nagpagaling;"

c) March, 1993 — "Po sir naka absent ako noon nagpunta kami sa kamaganakan — naming namatayan, medyo natagal-tagalan kami noon, kay critical masyado ang daan, kaya hindi kami agad nakauwi;"

d) April, 1993 — "Sir talagang wala na akong peace of mind parati na lang kami nag-aaway, minsan nakabitiw siya ng salita na hindi tama, kaya sir hinding hindi ko matanggap. Alam mo naman sir ang damdamin ng babae, iba talaga;"

e) May, 1993 — "Puro nalang about family trouble. Kaya po sir nakadisisyon na lang ako mag leave by June, July & August by (3 mos). Umalis po ako sir na walang paalam, dahil sa hindi na kami nagkain(tin)dihan ng Mr, ko. Hindi ko alam na may letter ako kay Atty. Baumann (to) explain within 5 days. Pero po sir wala ako sa panahon na iyon sa aming bahay, kaya hindi ko alam.

Respondent Grecia throws herself at the mercy of the Court, with the appeal that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Sir sana po maintindihan mo ako sa aking suliranin, maawa po kayo sir. Ang pagkakamali ko, aaminin ko po lahat sir. Pero hinding hindi na po mauulit po I swear po sir, MARK MY WORD po sir, kahit walang po Christmas sa akin, wala na po akong maaasahan pa. Ulilang lubos na po ako at wala na po akong trabaho ang Mister ko po sir. Nawa’y maawa po sana kayo sir sa akin. . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library

The Court has thoroughly reviewed the records of this administrative matter, including the original rollo thereof when it was still docketed as Administrative Matter No. 94-7-52-MTCC, before the Court directed the Office of the Court Administrator to file a formal charge against respondent in its resolution of August 18, 1994 As earlier stated, the foregoing findings of complainant reflect a correct and complete chronological narrative of respondent’s regrettable actuations.

In the same report of the Office of the Court Administrator, dated April 20, 1995, this discussion of the unfortunate situation obtaining in Branch I, Municipal Trial Court in Cities, General Santos City, follows from the aforestated factual findings:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Section 22, paragraph (q), Rule XIV, Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V (Civil Service Law), EO 292 provides, among others, that frequent unauthorized absence or tardiness in reporting for duty, loafing or frequent unauthorized absences during regular office hours carries a penalty of suspension of six (6) months and one (1) day to one (1) year for the first offense, and dismissal for the second offense.

Mrs. Grecia has admitted her unauthorized absences. She even stated that she decided to absent herself for the months of June, July and August 1993 WITHOUT PERMISSION from her superiors because of marital problems.

Her unauthorized absences started (in) May of 1983 when she was still Ms. Alfafara. Now that she is Mrs. Grecia, she is incurring more unauthorized absences primarily because of marital troubles.

While this Office would like to sympathize with respondent due to the fact that she is having problems with her marriage, the fact is that she is prejudicing public service with her frequent unauthorized absences. The public image of a well-functioning courtroom has been entirely demolished for as Judge Majaducon stated in his Memorandum to respondent dated October 2, 1992: "We have the dirtiest courtroom."cralaw virtua1aw library

This is not a mere case of frequent unauthorized absences within a localized period of time, e.g., a one (1) year period. This is a case of CONTINUOUS VIOLATION — Frequent Unauthorized Absences — of the Civil Service Law if we take into account that her absences span a period of at the very least ten (10) years, i.e., May of 1983 to June of 1993.

It should be noted that Section 23, paragraph (b) of the abovementioned rules provides that a civil service employee found guilty of Gross Neglect of Duty is meted the penalty of Dismissal for the FIRST offense.

Everytime respondent absents herself without permission from her superiors, she also neglects her duty of cleaning the court room and court offices. This has been going on repeatedly for also ten (10) years.

By her own admission, respondent Grecias a public officer and public servant, "has been remiss in the performance of the duties of her office which demands utmost dedication and efficiency."cralaw virtua1aw library

We find these observations to be correct, just as we find the recommendation for respondent’s dismissal from the service to be justified. Indeed, even with the fullest measure of sympathy and patience, we cannot act otherwise since the exigencies of government service cannot and should never be subordinated to purely human equations.chanrobles virtualawlibrary chanrobles.com:chanrobles.com.ph

ACCORDINGLY, respondent Lolita Alfafara Grecia is hereby DISMISSED from the service with forfeiture of all benefits and with prejudice to her reemployment in any branch of the Government, including government-owned or controlled corporations.

SO ORDERED

Narvasa C . J., Feliciano, Padilla, Regalado, Davide, Jr., Romero, Bellosillo, Melo, Quiason, Puno, Vitug, Kapunan, Mendoza and Francisco, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1995 Jurisprudence                 

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-93-835 July 3, 1995 - GERARDO C. ALVARADO v. LILY A. LAQUINDANUM

  • G.R. No. 107748 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCIANO SAPURCO

  • G.R. No. 109248 July 3, 1995 - GREGORIO F. ORTEGA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110558 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CELEDONIO B. DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112279 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERT ALBAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114698 July 3, 1995 - WELLINGTON INVESTMENT AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. CRESENCIANO B. TRAJANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115304 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLAND L. MELOSANTOS

  • G.R. No. 110240 July 4, 1995 - ENJAY INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109036 July 5, 1995 - BARTOLOME F. MERCADO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Case No. 2747 July 6, 1995 - GODOFREDO A. VILLALON v. JIMENEZ B. BUENDIA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1008 July 6, 1995 - FLORENTINA BILAG-RIVERA v. CRISANTO FLORA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1026 July 6, 1995 - VICTOR BASCO v. DAMASO GREGORIO

  • G.R. No. 100912 July 6, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ZALDY A. CRISTOBAL

  • G.R. Nos. 103560 & 103599 July 6, 1995 - GOLD CITY INTEGRATED PORT SERVICE, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109166 July 6, 1995 - HERNAN R. LOPEZ, JR. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 112973-76 July 6, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO PAGCU, JR.

  • G.R. No. 110321 July 7, 1995 - HILARIO VALLENDE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112629 July 7, 1995 - PHIL. NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118644 July 7, 1995 - EPIMACO A. VELASCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102930 July 10, 1995 - BONIFACIO MONTILLA PEÑA v. CA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 119055 July 10, 1995 - ROY RODILLAS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • CBD Case No. 251 July 11, 1995 - ADELINA T. VILLANUEVA v. TERESITA STA. ANA

  • G.R. No. 109370 July 11, 1995 - ROGELIO PARMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110015 July 11, 1995 - MANILA BAY CLUB CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112046 July 11, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTHONY ONG CO

  • G.R. No. 115245 July 11, 1995 - JUANITO C. PILAR v. COMMISSION ON ELECTION

  • G.R. No. 116008 July 11, 1995 - METRO TRANSIT ORGANIZATION, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79896 July 12, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DELFIN L. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114167 July 12, 1995 - COASTWISE LIGHTERAGE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114186 July 12, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR R. ERNI

  • Adm. Case No. 3283 July 13, 1995 - RODOLFO MILLARE v. EUSTAQUIO Z. MONTERO

  • Adm. Matter Nos. MTJ-93-806 & MTJ-93-863 July 13, 1995 - ERLINO LITIGIO, ET AL. v. CELESTINO V. DICON

  • Bar Matter No. 712 July 13, 1995 - IN RE: AL C. ARGOSINO

  • G.R. No. 106769 July 13, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO WEDING

  • G.R. No. 109573 July 13, 1995 - SEVEN BROTHERS SHIPPING CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110580 July 13, 1995 - MANUEL BANSON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110930 July 13, 1995 - OSCAR LEDESMA AND COMPANY, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 116049 July 13, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUSTAQUIO Z. GACOTT, JR., ET AL.

  • Adm. Case No. 1048 July 14, 1995 - WELLINGTON REYES v. SALVADOR M. GAA

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-90-400 July 14, 1995 - SUSIMO MOROÑO v. AURELIO J.V. LOMEDA

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-93-818 July 14, 1995 - ENRIQUITO CABILAO, ET AL. v. AGUSTIN T. SARDIDO

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-932 July 14, 1995 - JESUS F. MANGALINDAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-963 July 14, 1995 - MARILOU NAMA MORENO v. JOSE C. BERNABE

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1012 July 14, 1995 - ERNESTO G. OÑASA, JR. v. EUSEBIO J. VILLARAN

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1030 July 14, 1995 - GABRIEL C. ARISTORENAS, ET AL. v. ROGELIO S. MOLINA, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1075 July 14, 1995 - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. LOLITA A. GRECIA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1086 July 14, 1995 - ALFERO C. BAGANO v. ARTURO A. PANINSORO

  • G.R. Nos. L-66211 & L-70528-35 July 14, 1995 - ARTURO Q. SALIENTES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 82220, 82251 & 83059 July 14, 1995 - PABLITO MENESES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88384 July 14, 1995 - FEDERATION OF LAND REFORM FARMERS OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 89103 July 14, 1995 - LEON TAMBASEN v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91494 July 14, 1995 - CONSOLIDATED BANK AND TRUST CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 92167-68 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE R. LEGASPI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92660 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIXTO MORICO

  • G.R. No. 96489 July 14, 1995 - NICOLAS G. SINTOS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 97251-52 July 14, 1995 - JOVENCIO MINA, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 97435 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINGO TEVES

  • G.R. No. 98920 July 14, 1995 - JESUS F. IGNACIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101135 July 14, 1995 - TEODORO RANCES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101286 July 14, 1995 - GIL RUBIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101875 July 14, 1995 - CASIANO A. NAVARRO III v. ISRAEL D. DAMASCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102297 July 14, 1995 - NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH OF GOD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102993 July 14, 1995 - CALTEX REFINERY EMPLOYEES ASSOC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104639 July 14, 1995 - PROVINCE OF CAMARINES SUR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104682 July 14, 1995 - CAPITOL WIRELESS, INC. v. VICENTE S. BATE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105763 July 14, 1995 - LORENDO QUINONES, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106279 July 14, 1995 - SULPICIO LINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108870 July 14, 1995 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109680 July 14, 1995 - DIEGO RAPANUT v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111515 July 14, 1995 - JACKSON BUILDING CONDOMINIUM CORP., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112399 July 14, 1995 - AMADO S. BAGATSING v. COMMITTEE ON PRIVATIZATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112679 July 14, 1995 - COUNTRY BANKERS INSURANCE CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113448 July 14, 1995 - DANILO Q. MILITANTE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113578 July 14, 1995 - SUPLICIO LINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118597 July 14, 1995 - JOKER P. ARROYO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-997 July 17, 1995 - CHRISTOPHER CORDOVA, ET AL. v. RICARDO F. TORNILLA

  • G.R. No. 53877 July 17, 1995 - GREGORIO LABITAD, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91987 July 17, 1995 - A’ PRIME SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. FRANKLIN DRILON

  • G.R. No. 108891 July 17, 1995 - JRS BUSINESS CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 109613 July 17, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO MAHINAY

  • G.R. No. 109809 July 17, 1995 - VALLACAR TRANSIT, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110910 July 17, 1995 - NATIONAL SUGAR TRADING CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111797 July 17, 1995 - CARLOS ANG GOBONSENG, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112060 July 17, 1995 - NORBI H. EDDING v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112127 July 17, 1995 - CENTRAL PHILIPPINE UNIVERSITY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112230 July 17, 1995 - NORKIS DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113917 July 17, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELICIA M. CABACANG

  • G.R. No. 118910 July 17, 1995 - KILOSBAYAN, INC., ET AL. v. MANUEL L. MORATO

  • G.R. No. 119326 July 17, 1995 - NARCISO CANSINO v. DIRECTOR OF NEW BILIBID PRISON

  • G.R. No. 106539 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TORTILLANO NAMAYAN

  • G.R. No. 108789 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ABE ROSARIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114681 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RONALD AGUSTIN

  • G.R. No. 115115 July 18, 1995 - CONRAD AND COMPANY, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107439 July 20, 1995 - MICHAEL T. UY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-114382 July 20, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ESTEBAN ACOB, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115884 July 20, 1995 - CJC TRADING, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 117932 July 20, 1995 - AVON DALE GARMENTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 106425 & 106431-32 July 21, 1995 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110591 July 26, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIBURCIO E. BACULI

  • G.R. No. 107495 July 31, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLO Y. UYCOQUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110106 July 31, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO R. MONTIERO

  • G.R. No. 111905 July 31, 1995 - ORIENTAL MINDORO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.