Title 32: National Defense
PART 650—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT (AR 200–1)
Subpart J—Environmental Pollution Prevention, Control, and Abatement Report (RCS DD-I&L (SA) 1383)
Instructions for the Preparation and Submission of Exhibits
Browse Previous
§ 650.238 Exhibit 3—Narrative Report.
(a) The narrative report will be a brief summary of the command environmental program. No specific format is prescribed; however, it will contain the following:
(1) Financial displays for the current FYDP period by appropriation account (MCA, PA, OMA, etc.) and by program media (air, water, noise, etc.). The elements of the program presented in the Exhibit 1–EM are to be aggregated by management activity to identify funding requirements for training, preparation of EIA/EIS, environmental surveys and studies, personnel costs, etc.
(2) An explanation of the environmental objectives to be achieved by completing the projects reported or funding those activities contained in Exhibit 1's. For any specific portion of the program that requires more than 12 months to complete, identify the major milestones for accomplishing the actions.
(3) Elements of the command program that will be given particular emphasis over the short term.
(4) Projection of when statutory pollution control requirements, Federal or state, will be satisfied by the various elements of a command.
(5) Summary of potential or pending environmental litigation involving installations within the command.
(6) Explanation of anticipated problem areas requiring DA assistance.
(b) The content of the narrative report is basically a forecast of how the major command intends to accomplish its environmental program during the succeeding 12 months. This requirement should not be confused with the requirement for the annual status report (RCS DD-I&L(A) 1269), specified in §650.9 of subpart A of this part of this regulation, which is an annual summary of environmental protection accomplishments for the specified preceding calendar year.
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency:
Project No:
Media:
Date Prepared:Date Revised:GSA InventoryControl No.:
1. Facility.
Name____________________
Address____________________
(city, county, state) Agency contact____________________
(name, title, telephone)
2. Specific Type of Pollution.
3. Amount of Pollution.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem.
8. Applicable Standards. (Cite the specific State, interstate, local, or Federal regulation and specific requirement for which the project is needed.)
9. Project Schedule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agency Regulation schedule_month schedule_month and year and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion)..................... .............. ..............Construction (start).................... .............. ..............Construction (completion)............... .............. ..............Operation (start)....................... .............. ..............Final compliance........................ .............. ..............------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
10. Other Relevant Information.
11. Funding Schedule.
Figure 10–1
Exhibit 1–EM
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Management Requirement
Date Prepared:
Dated Revised:
GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility. Name:____________________
Address:____________________
(city, county, state) Agency Contact:____________________
(name, title, telephone)
2. Resource Identification.
3. Explanation and Justification of Resource Requirement. Identify why resources, personnel and/or funds are needed for the “management” or conduct of the installation environmental program.
4. Proposed Resource Schedule. List by fiscal year for the period of the FYDP, when applicable.
5. Funding. Indicate appropriation account, amounts by fiscal year and whether amount is programed or unprogramed.
6. Other Relevant Information.
Figure 10–2
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Air Project No.: A-078CDated Prepared: 5/26/73Date Revised: 2/11/74GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: ABC Army Ammunition Plant.
Address: Kingstown, George County, S.C.
Agency Contact: MJR B. A. Smith Facility Engineer (615) 765–4321.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. NO2
3. Amount of Pollution. 4,500/hr when process is operated at maximum rate.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. Nitric Acid Plant No. 13, Bldg. A.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. No control measures.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. 0% Removal efficiency.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Construct packed column control device 94% efficient to achieve full compliance.
8. Applicable Standards. (1) State: State Air Code, Chapter V, S113.a(ii)
(2) Region:
(3) Actual standard or exact citation: Maximum of 450/hr allowed as per the XYZ test method; effective date of emission standard is 1/31/72.
9. Project Schedule.
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agency Regulation schedule_month schedule_month and year and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion)..................... 4-74 4-74Construction (start).................... 10-74 9-74Construction (completion)............... 1-75 11-74Final Operation (start)................. 6-75 5-75Final compliance........................ 7-75 9-75------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Explanation of difference between items 8 and 9: project advanced to provide margin of safety.
10. Other Relevant Information. Citizens complaints received on 12/15/73. Suits initiated on 12/30/73 by Onaconda Environmental Study Group.
11. Funding.
|
[In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal years PEMA ----------------------------------------- 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980------------------------------------------------------------------------Programed..................... \1\ $875 0 0 0 0Unprogramed................... 0 0 0 0 0------------------------------------------------------------------------\1\ Included as part of plant modernization program.
|
Figure 10–3
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Water Project No.: A-999b.Date Prepared: 2–29–72Date Revised: 12–26–73GSA Inventory Control No.: 45678
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer. (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Domestic sewage, partly treated. Existing treatment plant overloaded. Excess flow bypassed to river. Influent includes small amounts (.01 mgd) of filter backwash from water treatment plant containing precipitates of alum, iron, and manganese.
3. Amount of Pollution. Total flow: 6.2 mgd. Treated: 4.0 mgd.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. Secondary treatment plant discharges to Obstacle River, 3 miles below Mulch City water supply intake.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. Secondary—high rate trickling filter plant, final sedimentation, and chlorination. Design Capacity=4.0 mgd.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control.
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ In parts per million ----------------------------------- Principal constituent Treated Percent Influent effluent removal------------------------------------------------------------------------BOD5................................ 235.00 36.00 83Suspended solids.................... 392.00 60.00 85Total phosphorous as P.............. 8.98 4.67 48Total nitrogen as N................. 24.96 21.14 15------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Replace existing treatment plant with AWT plant: chemical/activated sludge/multi-media filtration to achieve 95 percent removals or better. Design capacity=7.5 mgd.
8. Applicable Standards. State Standards. SD Code: Water Poll—Chapter 61, 1960 Supp. SD Code: Public Health—Chapter 27, 1960 Supp. Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters: Reg E–1.10A (Rev.).
Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 125, 133, PL 92–500, SS 301, 313, PL 92–500, S 402–NPDES, NPDES Permit Number-SD0012345, Permit Period—1974–1979.
9. Project Schedule.
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agency Regulation schedule_month schedule_month and year and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion)..................... 4-75 N/AConstruction (start).................... 6-75 5-75Construction (completion)............... 2-77 1-77Operation (start)....................... 4-77 N/AFinal compliance........................ 6-77 7-77------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Regulation schedule as required by NPDES permit. State water quality standard requires adequate secondary treatment by 1/74.
Unable to meet State requirement because of design problems and funding cycle. State has permitted delay on condition NPDES permit deadline is met.
10. Other Relevant Information. Installation may become surplus in FY 75 or FY 76 leading to project discontinuance.
Funding.
|
[In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal year MCA ----------------------------------------- 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980------------------------------------------------------------------------Programed..................... 0 $8,000 0 0 0Unprogramed................... 0 0 0 0 0------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Figure 10–4
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army.
Media: Solid Waste. Project No.: A-001Date Prepared:2/11/74Date Revised:GSA InventoryControl No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, SD
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities
Engineer (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Camp landfill.
3. Amount of Pollution. Leachate of high BOD concentration.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. Landfill is used for disposal of installation wastes. Due to frequent rains, wastes build up high moisture content and leachate, which emanates from side of fill. Also, area is noted to be a common breeding ground for flies and mosquitos, and is generally unsightly.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. a. Landfill receives 10 tons per day of solid waste altogether, 5 from the Camp and 5 from the nearby Lindberg Air Base. It consists mainly of normal municipal-type wastes delivered on Monday, Wednesday and Friday of each week. Once a week a large load of oily rags is dumped in one corner of the landfill site.
b. Landfill was first opened in Summer of 1970 and is designed to operate until 1990.
c. Some control of run-off waters is exercised by a trench on the downhill side of landfill draining into a settling pond.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Trench prevents run-off waters from entering local bay waters, but does not solve vector, or aesthetic problems, nor does it minimize the amount of leachate forming.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Purchase of bulldozer to compact and cover wastes, minimize formation of leachate, control vectors, and improve general appearance. Relocate landfill to area with better drainage.
8. Applicable Standards. EPA Guidelines for Land Disposal of Solid Wastes, published in Federal Register July 1, 1974, requirements under §§241.204, 241.207, 241.208, 241.209, and 241.210.
9. Project Schedule.
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agency Agency schedule schedule month and month and year year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion)............................. N/A N/AConstruction (start)............................ N/A N/AConstruction (completion)....................... N/A N/ABegin procurement action........................ 7-75 N/AOperation (start)............................... 7-76 N/AFinal compliance................................ 7-76 N/A------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
10. Other Relevant Information. Station planning to build an incinerator in 1980 to extend life of landfill.
11. Funding.
|
[In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal years --------------------------------------- 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980------------------------------------------------------------------------ PEMA:Programed....................... 0 0 0 0 0Unprogramed..................... $30 0 0 0 0 OMA:Programed engineering study..... $3 0 0 0 0Unprogramed construction new ...... $10 ...... ...... ...... landfill.......................------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Figure 10–5
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army.
Media: Radiation. Project No.: A-001Date Prepared:6/14/74Date Revised:6/15/74GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway, Power Reactor.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Tritium in primary water cooling system.
3. Amount of Pollution. Tritium concerntrates exceed new NRC, EPA and DA standards for discharge of primary coolant water.
4. Pollution Source and Discharge, Emission or Deposit Point. Primary coolant water discharged to holding tank and then periodically released to Lake Enny.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measure. Holding tank before release to lake.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Only limited decay obtained from retention in holding tank.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Redesign holding tank system to include addition of ion exchanger.
8. Applicable Standards and Regulations. 10 CFR parts 20 and 50, 40 CFR part 190 and AR 385–80.
9. Project Schedule.
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agency Agency schedule_month schedule_month and year and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion)..................... 2-75 N/AConstruction (start).................... 5-75 N/AConstruction (completion)............... 7-75 N/AOperation (start)....................... 8-75 N/AFinal compliance........................ 8-75 N/A------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
10. Other Relevant Information. None.
11. Funding.
|
[In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal years MCA --------------------------------------- 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980------------------------------------------------------------------------Program......................... $375 ...... ...... ...... ......------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Figure 10–6
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Noise Project No.: A-001Date Prepared: 6/1/74Date Revised:GSA Inventory Control No.: 45678
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, SD
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Noise is broadband with discernible tones. (Noise is nonimpulsive; it is continuous at a steady in level, but with a discernible tone).
3. Amount of Pollution. The source measures 75 dBA at the property line. Source is 20 feet from boundary line at a height of 15 feet. Facilities or areas affected: Civilian school and housing (off the installation).
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. One power plant with forced draft fans and cooling tower.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. No noise control exists. Acoustic expertise-Acoustics, Inc., Chicago, IL.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. None.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problems. Installation of commercially available mufflers on all forced draft fans and noise enclosure on cooling tower. It is expected that this action will lower the sound level below the background noise.
8. Applicable Standards. Mulch Noise Ordinance, Section 4–12, Chapter 17 of the Municipal Code of Mulch, requires that the noise level at the boundary line in business and commercial districts not exceed 62 dBA.
9. Project Schedule.
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agency Agency schedule_month schedule_month and year and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion)..................... 9-76 N/AConstruction (start).................... 11-74 N/AConstruction (completion)............... 2-77 N/AOperation (start)....................... 3-77 N/AFinal compliance........................ 4-77 N/A------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
The standards require immediate compliance. Agency schedule provides for earliest possible installation of control measures.
10. Other Relevant Information. (a) Community complaints have included 26 telephone calls, 15 letters, and 3 personal visits. Nature of complaints centered upon annoyance. (Log of noise complaints attached.)
(b) Legal action has not been initiated but may be by County School Board.
11. Funding.
|
[In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal years OMA --------------------------------------- 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980------------------------------------------------------------------------(a) Mufflers on forced draft fans: Programed..................... ...... $25 ...... ...... ...... Unprogramed................... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......(b) Enclosures on cooling tower: Programed..................... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... Unprogramed................... ...... $10 ...... ...... ......------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Figure 10–7
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Pesticides & Hazardous/Toxic Materials Project No.: A-002Date Prepared:Sept. 15, 1974Date Revised: ____________GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway. Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific type of pollution. The following pesticides registered for the control of pests: malathion, diazinon, chlorpyrifos, propoxur, lindane, chlordane.
3. Amount of Pollution. Quantities of pesticide concentrate mixed per month: Malathion, 10 gal; diazinon, 10 gal; chlorpyrifos, 7 gal; propoxur, 10 gal; lindane, 2 gal; chlordane, 10 gal.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. N/A.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. Mixing sink with sump.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Sink too small. Inadequate neutralization and sump capacity. Requires manual bailing.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Replace small mixing sink with larger double mixing sink. Install a neutralization and holding tank with sump pump for pesticide rinses.
8. Applicable Standards. Executive Order 11643—Environmental Safeguards on Activities for Animal Damage Control on Federal Lands. February 8, 1972. Additionally, the EPA, under statutory authority of Section 4, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended by the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act.
9. Project Schedule.
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agency Agency schedule_month schedule_month and year and year------------------------------------------------------------------------Design (completion)..................... 10-75 N/AConstruction (start).................... 1-76 N/AConstruction (completion)............... 3-76 N/AOperation (start)....................... 4-76 N/A------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
10. Other Relevant Information. Other stocks of suspended on finally cancelled pesticides will be stored until proper disposal methods are developed. Inventory: 5 percent DDT in oil—350 gallons; 75 percent DDT wettable powder—220 lbs.
11. Funding Schedule.
|
[In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal years OMA --------------------------------------- 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980------------------------------------------------------------------------Programed....................... $3.0 0 0 0 0Unprogramed..................... 0 0 0 0 0------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Figure 10–8
Exhibit 1–EM
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Management Report
Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Management Date Prepared:1 Oct 74Date Revised:GSA InventoryControl No.:12345
1. Facility.
Name: Fort Stoner.
Address: Podunk, Organ County, SD
Agency Contact: Col J. J. Jones, Facility Engineer, AV 823–1555.
2. Resource Identification. Training.
3. Explanation and Justification of Resource Requirement. Training is required for sewage treatment plant superintendent, operators and laboratory technician to meet certification standards of South Dakota. A new sewage treatment plant will be put into operation in December 1975 and trained personnel will be required to operate it. Current personnel are not familiar with the operation of the new plant and require instructions on State requirements and standards.
4. Proposed Resource Schedule. Training offered at University of South Dakota. Attendance at one-week courses is as follows:
|
[In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal years OMA --------------------------------------- 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979------------------------------------------------------------------------Superintendent.................. ...... ...... ...... ...... ......Operator........................ ...... 2 2 1 1Lab technician.................. ...... 1 ...... ...... ......------------------------------------------------------------------------
[In thousands of dollars]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal years OMA --------------------------------------- 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979------------------------------------------------------------------------Programed....................... $0.2 $0.6 ...... ...... ......Unprogramed..................... ...... ...... $0.4 $0.2 $0.2------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
6. Other Relevant Information. Outyear requirements reflect training for new hires.
Figure 10–9
|
Exhibit 2 pollution status report ------------------------------------------------------------ (media) Appropriation account: _________ (OMA, MCA, etc.) Agency Page ___ of ___Agency contact Reporting Date _________Telephone----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project name and Project costs ($1,000's)_Amount in President's budget or agency plan or amount appropriated or funded location (GSA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Present cost Project No. inventory Current fiscal estimate Status control No.) Fiscal year -2 Fiscal year -1 year Fiscal year +1 Fiscal year +2 Fiscal year +3------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note: Provide totals on the last page for each appropriation account.
